Class D Amplifier Feedback Switching for Low-Level Noise Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Class D amplifier circuits face limitations in portable devices due to size and power consumption constraints, primarily because of the noise and linearity requirements of analogue-to-digital converters (ADCs) used in feedback paths, which are not optimized for low signal amplitudes.

Innovation Solution

A Class D amplifier circuit that selectively varies its operation between closed-loop and open-loop modes based on the amplitude of the input signal, using a signal selector block and controller to determine when to include an error signal in the modulator input, thereby reducing the need for high-performance ADCs at low signal levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a continuous-time ADC is used in the feedback path to suppress noise, then noise performance is improved, but the device size and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise performanceVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the feedback loop operational status dynamic rather than static. The feedback path is selectively enabled or disabled based on the instantaneous amplitude of the input signal. When the signal amplitude exceeds a threshold, the feedback loop is activated to suppress noise; when the signal amplitude is below the threshold, the feedback loop is deactivated to reduce power consumption and device complexity. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between maintaining good noise performance and reducing device size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a continuous-time ADC is used in the feedback path to maintain linearity, then linearity is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelinearityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by intermittently activating the feedback loop based on signal amplitude conditions. Rather than continuously operating the ADC and feedback path, the system periodically engages the feedback mechanism only when the input signal amplitude justifies its use. This periodic activation maintains linearity when needed while significantly reducing average power consumption, resolving the contradiction between linearity and power efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If feedback is always applied, then signal quality is improved, but noise floor increases at low signal levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidnoise floor
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the feedback application selective rather than uniform across all signal conditions. The feedback loop is locally activated only in the high signal amplitude region where it provides benefit, while being deactivated in the low signal amplitude region where it would degrade performance by raising the noise floor. This localized application of feedback resolves the contradiction between maintaining signal quality and minimizing noise floor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11121690B2Class D amplifier circuit
Publication Date: 2021.09.14 CIRRUS LOGIC INC
  • US11121690B2 patent drawing
  • US11121690B2 patent drawing
  • US11121690B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This application relates to Class D amplifier circuits. A modulator controls a Class D output stage based on a modulator input signal (Dm) to generate an output signal (Vout) which is representative of an input signal (Din). An error block, which may comprise an ADC, generates an error signal (ε) from the output signal and the input signal. In various embodiments the extent to which the error signal (ε) contributes to the modulator input signal (Dm) is variable based on an indication of the amplitude of the input signal (Din). The error signal may be received at a first input of a signal selector block. The input signal may be received at a second input of the signal selector block. The signal selector block may be operable in first and second modes of operation, wherein in the first mode the modulator input signal is based at least in part on the error signal; and in the second mode the modulator input signal is based on the digital input signal and is independent of the error signal. The error signal can be used to reduce distortion at high signal levels but is not used at low signal levels and so the noise floor at low signal levels does not depend on the component of the error block.