Closed-Loop Class-D Amplifier With Fixed Switching Frequency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Class-D power amplifiers face issues with electromagnetic interference (EMI) due to varying switching frequencies, which can affect audio performance and sensitivity, particularly in applications like vehicle electronics and audio broadcasting.

Innovation Solution

A close-loop Class-D power amplifier with a fixed-frequency control method that uses a comparator with a small hysteresis loop, coupled with a high-frequency triangular or rectangular wave, and a feedback circuit to maintain a stable switching frequency, reducing EMI and improving system stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If analog adaptive modulation (AAM) technology is used to simplify the control circuit structure, then device complexity is reduced, but switching frequency varies heavily causing electromagnetic interference (EMI)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol circuit structureVSAvoidelectromagnetic interference (EMI)
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the output signal is fed back to the input stage through a feedback circuit. This feedback loop enables automatic regulation of the switching frequency to maintain it at a fixed value, thereby resolving the EMI issue caused by frequency variation while keeping the control circuit relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the switching frequency parameter from variable (in AAM) to fixed by introducing a frequency stabilization mechanism. The feedback circuit detects output variations and adjusts the switching frequency accordingly to maintain it constant, thus eliminating EMI problems associated with frequency modulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If conventional close-loop feedback control methods (instantaneous voltage mode or voltage-current double feedback loops) are used, then control precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidcircuit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a simplified feedback approach where only the output voltage is fed back to the input stage through a single feedback circuit, avoiding the complexity of dual feedback loops or instantaneous voltage mode control while still achieving effective closed-loop control and acceptable precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential feedback function needed for stable operation, removing unnecessary complex control circuits. By implementing a single feedback path rather than multiple interconnected feedback loops, the design achieves adequate control precision with significantly reduced complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively minimizes EMI by maintaining a fixed switching frequency, enhancing audio performance and reliability in various electronic applications while simplifying the control circuit structure and reducing costs.

Implementation Method 1

said comparator receives said input signal and the high-frequency triangular wave generated by said triangular wave generator or the high-frequency rectangular wave generated by said rectangular wave generator, and then outputs a first signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVoltage comparison:

Implementation Method 2

a feedback circuit, coupled between the output node of said output stage and the input node of said input stage, shapes said second signal to get a feedback signal which is negatively feedback to said input stage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative feedback: Feedback

Implementation Method 3

The SW signal at the output node C is restored to an amplified audio signal through a filter circuit composed of the inductor L and capacitor C1

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLow-pass filtering: Filter (electronic)

Data Source

PatentUS8004360B2Close-loop Class-D audio amplifier and control method thereof
Publication Date: 2011.08.23 MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC
  • US8004360B2 patent drawing
  • US8004360B2 patent drawing
  • US8004360B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention discloses a Class-D power amplifier and control method thereof. In one embodiment, the amplifier feeds back the signal at the output node to the inverting input of the comparator, and provides a high frequency triangular wave signal to the non-inverting input of the comparator. In addition, the non-inverting input of the comparator may be coupled to an offset voltage, while the inverting input of the comparator may be coupled to a fixed-frequency rectangular wave signal, a feedback signal which is derived from the output stage and an input signal. In use, the switching frequency may be at least substantially fixed, so as to reduce the influence on the system caused by electromagnetic interruption (EMI). Further, the control circuit is simple, and some devices can be integrated.