Class II Gaming Randomization via Machine Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Indian casinos face revenue constraints due to the poor performance of Class II games compared to Class III games, leading to limited operational space and tax exemptions, as Class II games are less lucrative and taxed differently in Indian gaming jurisdictions.

Innovation Solution

Developing gaming systems and methods that conform to Class II regulations while mimicking the randomness of Class III games, enabling the creation and conversion of Class II games to perform similarly to Class III games, thereby allowing Indian casinos to operate more machines without additional fees.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If Class II games are used to avoid taxes and fees, then operating costs are reduced, but game performance and revenue generation deteriorate compared to Class III games

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetax and feesVSAvoidrevenue generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of Class III game mechanics within Class II game framework. The system uses a random number generator to simulate Class III-style reel strips and symbol arrangements, while the underlying architecture remains Class II with predetermined outcomes and bingo card mappings. This allows the game to visually and functionally replicate Class III performance characteristics without incurring Class III taxes and fees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts game parameters including reel strip configurations, symbol distributions, and outcome frequencies to match Class III performance metrics. By modifying these parameters within the Class II regulatory framework, the game achieves Class III-like revenue generation potential while maintaining Class II tax advantages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If Class III games are used to maximize revenue, then revenue generation improves, but taxes and fees increase by up to $35 per day per machine

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue generationVSAvoidtax and fees
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer that translates Class III game mechanics into Class II compliant operations. The system uses virtual reel strips and symbol mappings as intermediaries between the player interface and the outcome determination system, allowing Class III-style gameplay to be delivered through Class II regulatory channels, thereby eliminating the luxury tax while preserving revenue potential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of having Class III games directly generate revenue subject to taxes, the system inverts the approach by using Class II games with Class III-inspired mechanics. The outcome determination flows from predetermined Class II outcomes through virtual Class III-style presentations, effectively reversing the traditional architecture to achieve tax-free operation with Class III performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If Class II games are designed to meet regulatory requirements, then compliance with Class II regulations is achieved, but game randomness and player engagement deteriorate compared to Class III games

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidgame randomness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the game into distinct functional layers: the outcome determination layer operates under Class II rules with predetermined results and bingo card mappings, while the presentation layer uses virtual reel strips and symbol animations that provide Class III-style randomness and engagement. This segmentation allows each layer to optimize for its specific requirements without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical randomness of physical Class III slot machines with a virtual simulation layer. Instead of relying on physical reel mechanics that provide inherent randomness, the patent uses software-based virtual reel strips with predetermined outcomes that are mapped to Class II compliant results, substituting mechanical randomness with controlled virtual randomness that maintains player engagement while ensuring regulatory compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11037407B2Enhanced game randomization with machine mapping
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 SOCKEYE SOFTWARE DEV LLC
  • US11037407B2 patent drawing
  • US11037407B2 patent drawing
  • US11037407B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, devices, and non-transitory media of the various embodiments provide games and/or gaming machines that conform to Class II regulations, while producing randomness similar to Class III machines by assigning a set of common numbers to a unique machine map to create one or more randomized patterns which correspond to plurality of symbols outputting a game of chance on the display based at least in part on the one or more randomized patterns, wherein the game of chance is a new game or an existing game including but not limited to poker, keno, video reels, bingo, etc.