Class Incremental Learning with Feature and Semantic Drift Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing class incremental learning (CIL) methods face challenges in addressing catastrophic forgetting and representation drift, where old class representations become outdated and misclassification occurs due to the lack of access to past data, leading to suboptimal performance.

Innovation Solution

A method that models feature and semantic drift using separate models to estimate and update old class prototypes and features, allowing continual learning without storing past data, by leveraging a feature drift model and a semantic drift model to track and revive evanescent representations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the classifier is trained incrementally with new classes, then the model can learn new categories, but the classification accuracy for old classes deteriorates due to catastrophic forgetting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to learn new classesVSAvoidclassification accuracy for old classes
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates synthetic copies of old class samples by estimating their feature representations through drift models. Instead of storing actual old data, the system generates artificial training examples that mimic the statistical properties of past classes, allowing the model to rehearse and maintain accuracy without accessing original data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary estimation of feature drift and prototype evolution before catastrophic forgetting occurs. By continuously modeling how features and class prototypes change over time, the system proactively generates corrective training examples that prevent accuracy degradation rather than reacting after forgetting has occurred.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If exemplars of old classes are stored to prevent forgetting, then classification accuracy is maintained, but storage requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracy for old classesVSAvoiddata storage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical storage of exemplars with synthetic generation of training samples. Drift models estimate feature representations of old classes and generate artificial examples on-demand, eliminating the need for long-term storage of actual old data while maintaining the ability to rehearse and prevent forgetting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the essential statistical properties of old classes through drift modeling (feature drift patterns, prototype evolution) rather than storing complete exemplars. This extraction approach captures the necessary information for preventing forgetting while minimizing storage requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If regularization methods are used to prevent forgetting, then some performance is maintained, but the results underperform compared to state-of-the-art approaches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracy for old classesVSAvoidclassification performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts feature representations and class prototypes by modeling their drift over time. Instead of using static regularization constraints, the system changes parameters (feature distributions, prototype positions) based on estimated drift patterns, allowing the model to adapt to incremental learning while maintaining old class accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where drift models continuously monitor how features and prototypes evolve during incremental learning. This feedback information is used to generate corrective training examples that actively counteract forgetting, creating a closed-loop system that continuously optimizes performance rather than relying on passive regularization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12632785B2Method and apparatus for class incremental learning
Publication Date: 2026.05.19 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US12632785B2 patent drawing
  • US12632785B2 patent drawing
  • US12632785B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present application generally relates to a method for training a machine learning, ML, model using class incremental learning, and to a computer-implemented method and apparatus for using the trained machine learning, ML, model. The method may learn how to update semantic representations of old concepts (classes) by modelling drift of semantic representations. The method may also learn how to update feature representations of old concepts (classes) by modelling drift of feature representations