Classification Algorithm Segmentation for Active Learning Latency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Active learning systems in classification tasks face significant delays due to the need for extensive re-computation of complex models with each user input, making them impractical for applications like attribute-value extraction from natural language documents.

Innovation Solution

The classification algorithm is separated into input-invariant and input-dependent parts, allowing user input to modify only the latter, with recalculated results derived from simple combinations of both, reducing wait times between feedback iterations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the classification model is updated each time user feedback is provided, then the accuracy of the model is improved, but the wait time between feedback iterations becomes prohibitively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidwait time between feedback iterations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The classification algorithm is divided into two distinct parts: input-invariant parts that capture unchanging relationships between data elements, and input-dependent parts that embody probabilistic labeling. This segmentation allows the system to update only the input-dependent parts when user feedback is received, rather than re-computing the entire model, thereby reducing wait time while maintaining accuracy improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If the entire classification model is re-computed with each user input, then the model incorporates the latest feedback, but the computational complexity and time required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel adaptability to feedbackVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the classification algorithm into input-invariant and input-dependent parts, the system maintains adaptability to user feedback through updates to the input-dependent parts, while avoiding the computational complexity of re-computing the entire model including the unchanged input-invariant parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The input-invariant parts of the classification algorithm are pre-computed and stored before user feedback is received. This preliminary action allows the system to quickly incorporate new feedback by only updating the input-dependent parts, rather than performing full model re-computation each time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If active learning is implemented in classification tasks, then the model accuracy improves through user feedback, but the system becomes impractical due to excessive wait times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidpractical usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The segmentation of the classification algorithm into input-invariant and input-dependent parts enables active learning to be practically usable by dramatically reducing wait times between feedback iterations, while still maintaining the accuracy improvements that active learning provides.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

By pre-computing and storing the input-invariant parts of the classification algorithm, the system makes active learning practical for classification tasks by minimizing the computational burden during user feedback iterations, thereby improving ease of operation while preserving accuracy benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8027941B2Automated classification algorithm comprising at least one input-invariant part
Publication Date: 2011.09.27 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES LTD
  • US8027941B2 patent drawing
  • US8027941B2 patent drawing
  • US8027941B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A classification algorithm is separated into one or more input-invariant parts and one or more input-dependent classification parts. The input-invariant parts of the classification algorithm capture the underlying and unchanging relationships between the plurality of data elements being operated upon by the classification algorithm, whereas the one or more classification parts embody the probabilistic labeling of the data elements according to the various classifications. For any given iteration, a user's input is used to modify at least one classification part of the algorithm. Recalculated classification parts (i.e., updated classification results) are determined based on computationally simple combinations of the one or more modified classification parts and the one or more input-invariant parts. Preferably, a graphical user interface is used to solicit user input. In this manner, wait times between user feedback iterations can be dramatically reduced, thereby making application of active learning to classification tasks a practical reality.