Classification Microservices for Alternative Transaction Workflows

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing transaction processing systems are complex and inflexible, leading to inefficiencies, missed deadlines, and additional costs due to suboptimal workflows and incomplete transaction processing, necessitating a need for dynamic and alternative processing solutions.

Innovation Solution

A transaction exchange platform utilizing a streaming data platform and microservices, with classification microservices that leverage machine-learning models to determine and implement alternative workflows for transaction objects, ensuring efficient and complete processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a monolithic payment processing system is used to accommodate multiple transaction types and workflows, then the system can handle diverse transaction requirements, but the system complexity increases and any single point of failure can halt the entire approval process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle different transaction typesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the monolithic payment processing system into independent microservices, each responsible for specific transaction types or workflow steps. This segmentation allows the system to handle diverse transaction requirements while reducing overall complexity, as each microservice can be developed, deployed, and maintained independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal transaction processing framework that can accommodate multiple transaction types through a common interface and routing mechanism. This framework provides multi-functionality without requiring separate systems for each transaction type, thereby managing complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If the approval workflow is configured to enforce detailed regulations and security checks, then transaction processing reliability improves, but processing time increases and deadlines may be missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction processing reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic workflow configuration that can adjust the level of scrutiny and processing steps based on transaction characteristics, risk profiles, and regulatory requirements. This allows the system to maintain high reliability for complex transactions while reducing processing time for simpler, lower-risk transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key parameters of the approval process by implementing parallel processing paths, asynchronous validation steps, and conditional routing that can bypass certain checks based on pre-established criteria. This maintains reliability through comprehensive validation while reducing time loss through intelligent parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If a single workflow is used for all transactions of a type, then the processing logic is simple to implement, but alternative more effective workflows cannot be utilized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow implementation simplicityVSAvoidtransaction processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that monitor transaction processing outcomes and use this information to dynamically select or generate alternative workflows. The system learns from processing results and adjusts workflow selection to improve efficiency while maintaining implementation simplicity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the system to automatically generate and select alternative workflows based on transaction characteristics and historical performance data, without requiring manual configuration for each scenario. This self-service capability maintains simplicity while improving productivity through adaptive workflow selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive validation and approval steps are performed for each transaction, then processing accuracy improves, but transactions may stall or remain incomplete for significant periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing accuracyVSAvoidtransaction processing duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary validation and routing decisions before the main processing workflow begins. By pre-validating transaction data, pre-determining appropriate workflows, and pre-allocating processing resources, the system maintains high processing accuracy while reducing the duration of the main processing phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous processing through asynchronous validation steps, parallel processing paths, and automated fallback mechanisms that prevent transactions from stalling. The system maintains continuity of useful action by ensuring that validation and approval processes continue without interruption through multiple concurrent channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12493619B2Transaction exchange platform with classification microservice to generate alternative workflows
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US12493619B2 patent drawing
  • US12493619B2 patent drawing
  • US12493619B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects described herein may relate to a transaction exchange platform using a streaming data platform (SDP) and microservices to process transactions in accordance with corresponding workflows. The transaction exchange platform may receive transactions from origination sources, which may be added to the SDP as transaction objects. Microservices on the transaction exchange platform may interact with the transaction objects based on configured workflows associated with the transactions. Further, the microservices may leverage machine-learning models to determine whether transaction objects may be more effectively processed using alternative or secondary workflows. Processing on the transaction exchange platform may facilitate clearing and settlement of transactions. Some aspects may provide for dynamic and flexible reconfiguration of workflows.