Classification Model Training with Baseline Penalty

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning approaches face challenges in efficiently training classification models for real-time analysis of high-volume, continuously flowing data from geographically distributed sources, particularly in setting appropriate penalty values for optimal model performance.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the computation of a baseline penalty value inversely proportional to the square of the maximum explanatory variable value, followed by training and validation of classification models using a set of penalty values to determine the best model for predicting response variables, is implemented. This method includes computing a baseline penalty value, training models with each penalty value, validating them, and selecting the best model based on validation criteria.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional machine learning approaches are used for training classification models on high-volume continuously flowing data, then the system can process data from geographically distributed sources, but the model training becomes inefficient and fails to adapt quickly to dynamic data patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel training efficiencyVSAvoidtime to adapt to dynamic data patterns
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary computation of a baseline penalty value using observation vectors from the data stream before model training begins. This baseline penalty, calculated as inversely proportional to the square of the maximum explanatory variable value, serves as an optimized initial parameter that accelerates subsequent model training and enables quick adaptation to dynamic patterns without requiring time-consuming iterative optimization from scratch

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the penalty value parameter during operation based on incoming data patterns. By maintaining the ability to modify the penalty value in response to changing data characteristics, the classification model can adapt to dynamic patterns in real-time, resolving the contradiction between processing high-volume data and maintaining model quality over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If penalty values are manually tuned or set to fixed values, then the model training process is simple, but the model performance deteriorates when data patterns change dynamically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidpenality value adjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where observation vectors from the data stream are continuously used to compute and update the baseline penalty value. This feedback loop ensures that the penalty parameter automatically adapts to current data patterns, maintaining high model performance without requiring complex manual tuning procedures or fixed parameter settings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment by automatically computing optimized penalty values based on the statistical characteristics of incoming data. The baseline penalty computation using observation vectors eliminates the need for external manual intervention in parameter selection, allowing the model to self-optimize for changing data patterns while maintaining relatively simple implementation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of time

If the model is trained quickly with simple initialization, then the training time is reduced, but the model quality decays quickly in dynamic data environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining timeVSAvoidmodel quality stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary computation of an optimized baseline penalty value before model training begins. This pre-computed baseline, derived from observation vectors and scaled by the inverse square of the maximum explanatory variable value, provides high-quality initial parameters that enable both rapid training and sustained model quality without requiring lengthy optimization procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs parameter changes by using the computed baseline penalty as an initial value that can be dynamically adjusted during operation. This approach allows the model to start with well-inferred parameters for quick training while maintaining the flexibility to modify parameters in response to changing data patterns, thereby preserving model quality over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10049302B1Classification system training
Publication Date: 2018.08.14 SAS INSTITUTE INC
  • US10049302B1 patent drawing
  • US10049302B1 patent drawing
  • US10049302B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computing device trains models for streaming classification. A baseline penalty value is computed that is inversely proportional to a square of a maximum explanatory variable value. A set of penalty values is computed based on the baseline penalty value. For each penalty value of the set of penalty values, a classification type model is trained using the respective penalty value and the observation vectors to compute parameters that define a trained model, the classification type model is validated using the respective penalty value and the observation vectors to compute a validation criterion value that quantifies a validation error, and the validation criterion value, the respective penalty value, and the parameters that define a trained model are stored to the computer-readable medium. The classification type model is trained to predict the response variable value of each observation vector based on the respective explanatory variable value of each observation vector.