Classifier Validation Using Reduced-Set Error Bound Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing classifier validation methods struggle to accurately predict the out-of-sample error rate, leading to inefficient resource utilization and suboptimal decision-making in classifier selection for real-world applications.

Innovation Solution

A method for classifier validation that involves partitioning in-sample examples into reduced and remaining sets, identifying a subset of classifiers with low error rates, and computing an out-of-sample error bound using a posterior distribution and shrinkage ratio to improve accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing classifier validation methods are used to determine out-of-sample error rate, then validation can be performed, but extensive computing resources are required and accuracy in predicting error rates is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror rate prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The in-sample examples are partitioned into a reduced in-sample set and a remaining in-sample set. The reduced set is used for initial classifier evaluation and error count calculation, while the remaining set is used for final validation. This segmentation allows efficient pre-filtering of classifiers before applying more computationally intensive validation procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying full validation procedures to all classifiers, the method first applies a partial evaluation using the reduced in-sample set to identify a subset of classifiers with error counts below a threshold. Only these promising classifiers undergo the more resource-intensive out-of-sample error bound determination, avoiding waste of computational resources on clearly inferior classifiers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If a large number of classifiers are evaluated using traditional validation methods, then more accurate error rate estimation may be achieved, but the computational complexity and time required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassifier selection reliabilityVSAvoidvalidation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The method performs preliminary evaluation of all classifiers using the reduced in-sample set before conducting full validation. This preliminary action identifies a subset of classifiers that meet error threshold criteria, allowing the system to focus subsequent computational efforts only on promising candidates and thereby maintain high reliability while improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The reduced in-sample set serves as an intermediary between the full in-sample set and the final validation process. It enables a two-stage filtering mechanism where the first stage (using reduced set) acts as a mediator to eliminate clearly inferior classifiers before the second stage (using remaining set) performs detailed validation on promising candidates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If the entire in-sample set is used for both training and validation, then maximum data utilization is achieved, but the accuracy of out-of-sample error rate prediction deteriorates due to overfitting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata utilizationVSAvoiderror rate estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The in-sample set is segmented into reduced and remaining subsets that serve different functions. The reduced set is used for initial classifier assessment while the remaining set is reserved for out-of-sample error bound determination. This segmentation prevents overfitting by ensuring that some data is withheld from the training/selection process and used solely for independent validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method extracts a portion of the in-sample set (the remaining set) and sets it aside for dedicated validation purposes. This extraction ensures that the validation process uses data that was not involved in classifier training or selection, thereby providing an unbiased estimate of out-of-sample error rates and preventing overfitting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12619487B2Classifier validation
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 YAHOO ASSETS LLC
  • US12619487B2 patent drawing
  • US12619487B2 patent drawing
  • US12619487B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more computing devices, systems, and/or methods for classifier validation are provided. A set of in-sample examples are partitioned into a reduced in-sample set and a remaining in-sample set. The reduced in-sample set is processed using a set of classifiers. A subset of classifiers are identified as having error counts, over the reduced in-sample set, below a threshold number of errors. A training procedure is executed to select a classifier having a minimum error rate over the set of in-sample examples. If the classifier is within the subset of classifiers, then an out-of-sample error bound is determined for the classifier.