Classifier Training for Precision and Recall Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machine learning algorithms struggle to optimize performance using non-decomposable evaluation metrics, such as Precision, Recall, and Fβ-score, which are crucial in various applications, especially with deep architectures, as they are typically trained to minimize cross-entropy loss rather than directly optimizing these metrics.

Innovation Solution

A method is developed to train classifiers using gradient-based learning procedures with weighting factors from confusion matrices, employing adversarial prediction techniques to optimize non-decomposable metrics by finding a Nash equilibrium in a two-player game, ensuring robust performance across a range of metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If classifiers are trained to minimize cross-entropy loss, then training is simple and efficient, but performance on non-decomposable metrics like Precision, Recall, and Fβ-score is not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining simplicityVSAvoidperformance on non-decomposable metrics
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the training objective by changing the parameter being optimized from cross-entropy loss to a non-decomposable metric (such as Precision, Recall, or Fβ-score). This is achieved by formulating the training as an adversarial prediction game where the classifier learns to maximize these specific metrics directly, rather than indirectly through cross-entropy minimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary adversarial prediction game framework that mediates between the classifier and the non-decomposable metric. The game involves a predictor that generates predictions and an adversary that evaluates them according to the target metric, allowing the classifier to learn optimization of non-decomposable metrics through this intermediate game-theoretic structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If classifiers are trained to optimize non-decomposable metrics directly, then performance on these metrics is improved, but training complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance on non-decomposable metricsVSAvoidtraining complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training process into distinct roles within the adversarial prediction game: a predictor component that generates class predictions and an adversary component that evaluates performance according to the non-decomposable metric. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while working together to achieve the overall training objective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs partial action by focusing the adversarial prediction game on specific non-decomposable metrics (such as Precision, Recall, or Fβ-score) rather than attempting to optimize all possible evaluation metrics simultaneously. This selective approach reduces training complexity while still achieving significant performance improvements on the targeted metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If standard gradient-based training is used, then training efficiency is maintained, but optimization of non-decomposable metrics is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining efficiencyVSAvoidoptimization of non-decomposable metrics
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms within the adversarial prediction game where the adversary evaluates predictions using the non-decomposable metric and provides gradient feedback to the predictor. This feedback loop allows the classifier to learn how to optimize the target metric while maintaining training efficiency through gradient-based updates, similar to standard training procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11960991B2Device and method for training a classifier
Publication Date: 2024.04.16 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11960991B2 patent drawing
  • US11960991B2 patent drawing
  • US11960991B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for training a classifier, particularly a binary classifier, for classifying input signals to optimize performance according to a non-decomposable metric that measures an alignment between classifications corresponding to input signals of a set of training data and corresponding predicted classifications of the input signals obtained from the classifier. The method includes providing weighting factors that characterize how the non-decomposable metric depends on a plurality of terms from a confusion matrix of the classifications and the predicted classifications, and training the classifier depending on the provided weighting factors.