Claus Unit Sulfur Recovery with Oxygen Scavenger and Direct Catalysts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional sulfur recovery processes, such as the Claus process, face challenges in achieving high sulfur recovery efficiency due to sensitivity to oxygen levels, requiring precise control of the H2S:SO2 ratio and leading to incomplete sulfur conversion, which results in increased capital costs and operational complexities.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an oxygen scavenger catalyst stage to capture excess oxygen, followed by direct reduction and oxidation catalyst stages, allowing for flexible operation and eliminating the need for precise H2S:SO2 ratio control, and adding a caustic scrubber for zero emission, thereby enhancing sulfur recovery efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional Claus process is used, then sulfur recovery can be achieved, but recovery efficiency is limited to 93-97% and requires precise H2S:SO2 ratio control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur recovery efficiencyVSAvoidH2S:SO2 ratio control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The process is divided into multiple catalytic stages: first stage Claus reaction, second stage direct reduction of SO2 to H2S, and third stage selective oxidation of H2S to sulfur. This segmentation allows each stage to perform a specific function, eliminating the need for precise overall H2S:SO2 ratio control while achieving over 99.7% sulfur recovery efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The direct reduction catalyst acts as an intermediary that converts SO2 to H2S, which then serves as feedstock for the selective oxidation stage. This intermediary transformation decouples the H2S:SO2 ratio control requirement, allowing flexible operation without compromising sulfur recovery efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If conventional Claus process is used, then sulfur recovery is achieved, but incomplete conversion requires larger tail gas treating units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur recovery efficiencyVSAvoidtail gas treating unit size
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The process creates an optimized catalytic environment with multiple stages that completely convert sulfur compounds. The direct reduction and selective oxidation stages operate under conditions that maximize conversion efficiency, reducing tail gas volume to minimal levels and enabling near 100% sulfur recovery without requiring large tail gas treating units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

3Productivity

If conventional Claus process is used, then sulfur recovery is achieved, but capital costs and operational complexities increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur recovery efficiencyVSAvoidprocess operational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process merges the direct reduction and selective oxidation functions within the main Claus train, eliminating the need for separate tail gas treating units. This integration reduces overall process complexity and capital costs while achieving over 99.7% sulfur recovery efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves sulfur recovery efficiency of over 99.7%, reducing capital costs and operational complexities, and enabling more forgiving control of sulfur recovery processes, while minimizing environmental emissions.

Implementation Method 1

oxygen scavenger catalyst as known as 'AM' catalyst which performs as the oxygen scavenger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

direct reduction catalyst consists but no limited to Fe, Ni, Mo, Mn, and Al, for direct conversion of SO2 to sulfur

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 3

selective direct oxidation catalyst consists but not limited to Fe, Zn, Mg, Zn, and Cr catalyst for direct conversion of H2S to sulfur

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 4

conventional Claus catalyst which is Alumina or combination of alumina and titanium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS9023309B1Process of conversion sulfur compounds to elemental sulfur by using direct reduction and oxidation catalysts in Claus units
Publication Date: 2015.05.05 RAMESHNI MAHIN
  • US9023309B1 patent drawing
  • US9023309B1 patent drawing
  • US9023309B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Processes are for the conversion of the sulfur compounds to elemental sulfur through different catalytic stages after the reaction furnace of the Claus unit with air or oxygen. The steps are: 1—Conventional Claus thermal or catalytic stage; 2—Oxygen Scavenger catalytic stage to capture excess oxygen from the reaction furnace and to perform Claus reaction; a Selective Reduction stage that converts SO2 to elemental sulfur; and 4—Selective Oxidation stage that converts H2S to elemental sulfur. The tail gas flows to the incineration and stack and to the incineration plus caustic scrubber for achieving zero emissions.