Cleanable In Situ Spark Arrestor Wedge Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial dust collection systems face challenges in preventing fires and explosions due to uncontrolled sparks, particularly in environments where downtime cannot be tolerated, as existing spark arrestors are not 100% effective and often fail due to misalignment, dirt buildup, or corrosion.

Innovation Solution

A spark arrestor system with a housing containing elongated, spaced-apart wedge-shaped members that create a gap between 50 to 400 microns to effectively interrupt the flow of combustible particles, made from corrosion-resistant materials like galvanized steel, titanium, or stainless steel, and equipped with a spray cleaning system for maintenance, ensuring minimal pressure drops and high temperature resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional spark arrestors (wire mesh, baffles, cyclone separators) are used, then some level of spark reduction is achieved, but they fail due to misalignment, dirt buildup, corrosion, or other causes and are not 100% effective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespark arrestor effectivenessVSAvoidfire and explosion risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The spark arrestor is divided into multiple wedge-shaped members arranged in series, each creating a gap that contributes to spark interruption. This segmentation allows the system to achieve 100% effectiveness through cumulative action of multiple stages rather than relying on a single component

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wedge-shaped members have specifically optimized gap dimensions (50-400 microns) at critical locations where sparks are most likely to pass through. This local quality optimization ensures that the most vulnerable points in the system have the precise geometry needed to intercept sparks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If spark arrestors with tight gaps are used to improve spark interruption, then spark arrestor effectiveness increases, but pressure drop increases and gas flow efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespark arrestor effectivenessVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the spark arrestor into multiple wedge-shaped members with progressively optimized gaps, the system achieves effective spark interruption while distributing the pressure drop across multiple stages rather than concentrating it in a single tight screen or baffle

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gap dimensions are precisely controlled within the 50-400 micron range, representing an optimized parameter that balances spark interception effectiveness with acceptable pressure drop. This parameter optimization allows the system to maintain gas flow efficiency while achieving reliable spark arrest

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If spark arrestors are used in high-temperature industrial applications, then spark arrestor effectiveness is needed, but materials suffer from corrosion and thermal degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespark arrestor effectivenessVSAvoidservice life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The spark arrestor system employs corrosion-resistant materials such as stainless steel or other appropriate alloys that combine mechanical strength with resistance to thermal and chemical degradation. This material selection enables the system to maintain its structural integrity and operational effectiveness in harsh industrial environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system substantially eliminates sparks, allows for continuous operation with minimal maintenance, maintains efficient gas flow, and is suitable for high-temperature industrial applications, effectively preventing fires and explosions by ensuring all spark particles smaller than the maximum allowable diameter are removed.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of elongated, spaced-apart wedge-shaped members attached to an elongated backing member disposed in a gas flow area of the housing. The wedge-shaped members have a minimum gap between adjacent wedge-shaped members ranging from about 50 to about 400 microns

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical barrier filtration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 2

equipped with a spray cleaning system for maintenance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid spray cleaning: Fluid Spray

Data Source

PatentUS8172930B2Cleanable in situ spark arrestor
Publication Date: 2012.05.08 SUNCOKE TECH & DEV LLC
  • US8172930B2 patent drawing
  • US8172930B2 patent drawing
  • US8172930B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for reducing the occurrence of fires in a fabric filter dust collection system. The system includes an elongated housing having a first end and a second end distal from the first end. A gas flow inlet is provided in flow communication with an interior portion of the housing for flow of gas and particulates from a source into the housing. A gas flow outlet is provided in flow communication with the housing for flow of gas and particulates out of the housing and into the dust collection system. An elongated spark arrestor is disposed in the housing between the first end and the second end. The spark arrestor has a plurality of spaced-apart, wedge-shaped members having a gap between adjacent members sufficient to interrupt the flow of combustible particles from the source to the dust collection system.