Cleaning System Energy Optimization via Bundle Spacing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cleaning systems for container units, such as cans, face inefficiencies due to uncontrollable energy consumption, particularly when large bundle spacings occur, leading to increased energy waste in the manufacturing process.

Innovation Solution

A cleaning system and method that includes a control device to put cleaning devices into an energy-saving mode and adjust movement speed based on predefined bundle spacings, reducing energy consumption by optimizing operations when bundle spacings exceed a certain threshold, and a drying device that adjusts drying fluid flow and temperature accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cleaning devices operate continuously at full capacity, then cleaning reliability is maintained, but energy consumption increases significantly when bundle spacing exceeds threshold

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning system dynamically adjusts its operation mode based on real-time bundle spacing detection. When bundle spacing exceeds the threshold, the system transitions from full-capacity operation to energy-saving mode, and adjusts conveyor speed to maintain optimal spacing, thereby reducing energy consumption while preserving cleaning reliability when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control device changes operational parameters (cleaning device activation state and conveyor speed) based on the detected bundle spacing parameter. This parameter-based control enables the system to optimize energy consumption by adapting to varying production conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If bundle spacing is reduced by increasing conveyor speed, then energy waste is minimized, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy wasteVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback control mechanism where the control device continuously monitors bundle spacing and automatically adjusts conveyor speed to maintain optimal spacing. This closed-loop control minimizes energy waste while managing complexity through automated feedback-based regulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control device autonomously manages bundle spacing optimization by detecting spacing conditions and self-adjusting conveyor speed without requiring external intervention, thereby reducing energy waste while keeping the control system self-managing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240367206A1Cleaning system for cleaning container units, drying apparatus for drying, and method
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 BELVAC PRODUCTION MACHINERY INC
  • US20240367206A1 patent drawing
  • US20240367206A1 patent drawing
  • US20240367206A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a cleaning system (100) for cleaning container units (2), in particular cans, comprising a movement device (102), which is arranged and designed to move container bundles containing a plurality of container units (2) along a cleaning path, at least one cleaning device (106-120), which is arranged and designed to clean the container units (2) within at least one cleaning portion of the cleaning path, and a control device, which is signal-coupled to the cleaning device (106-120) and/or the movement device (102), which is configured to put the cleaning device (106-120) into an energy-saving mode when a predefined bundle spacing between two successive container bundles (1, 1′, 1″) is exceeded, and/or to set a movement speed for the movement device (102) in such a manner that a bundle spacing (126, 128) between two successive container bundles (1, 1′, 1″) is less than the predefined bundle spacing.