Clickable Cable Tray Assembly Without Bolts or Springs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cable tray connection systems require additional components like bolts, nuts, and springs, making them laborious, time-consuming, and costly to install, especially when surface treatments like hot-dip galvanizing are involved.

Innovation Solution

A cable tray design that allows adjacent trays to be connected without additional components, featuring a first end with barbs and a second end with barb openings, enabling a form-fitted and force-fitted connection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If additional components like bolts, nuts, and springs are used to connect cable trays, then connection stability and load bearing capacity are sufficient, but installation becomes laborious, time-consuming, and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection stabilityVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The barb and barb opening are integrated directly into the cable tray structure itself, eliminating the need for separate connection components. The barb protrudes from one tray while the barb opening is formed in the adjacent tray, creating a unified connection system that maintains strength while simplifying installation to a single snapping motion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cable tray design includes self-contained connection features where the barb and barb opening are built-in elements. The connection mechanism serves itself by using the tray's own structural elements to create the fastening system, eliminating dependency on external components and enabling easy self-installation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Strength

If additional components are used for cable tray connection, then connection strength is sufficient, but installation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection strengthVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The connection system is segmented into two simple integrated features: the barb protrusion and the barb opening. This segmentation allows for rapid assembly by simply aligning and snapping the features together, eliminating the time-consuming process of handling multiple separate components while maintaining connection strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The barb and barb opening are pre-formed as integral parts of the cable tray during manufacturing. This preliminary action ensures that no additional components need to be gathered or prepared during installation, reducing installation time while ensuring the connection features are precisely formed for strong connections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If spring-based connecting systems are used, then connection is achieved, but compatibility with hot-dip galvanizing surface treatment is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection functionalityVSAvoidsurface treatment compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The barb and barb opening connection system uses simple, robust metal features that are compatible with durable surface treatments like hot-dip galvanizing. Instead of using springs that may corrode or fail with certain surface treatments, the design employs simple protrusion-opening geometry that works reliably with galvanized surfaces, maintaining both functionality and surface treatment compatibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Stability of the object's composition

If additional components are used for cable tray connection, then connection stability is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection stabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The connection system merges the tray structure with the connection mechanism by integrating the barb and barb opening directly into the tray walls. This eliminates the need for separate bolts, nuts, or spring components, reducing system complexity while maintaining connection stability through the interlocking geometry of the integrated features

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3695474B1Clickable cable trays
Publication Date: 2025.04.09 VERGOKAN
  • EP3695474B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP3695474B1 patent drawingFigure 1c
  • EP3695474B1 patent drawingFigure 2Aa~2Ae

AI summary

The present invention provides cable trays which can be pushed inside one another and can be clicked onto one another. Furthermore, assemblies are provided which comprise cable trays, barbs for cable trays and related methods.