Client Account Validation Before Electronic Transfer Completion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current financial service systems lack adequate confirmation of the target account for electronic transactions, failing to validate the intended recipient account before completing transfers.

Innovation Solution

A banking application that receives user inputs, performs lookups in various databases, and provides validation results using machine learning to confirm the target account accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If electronic transfer systems are implemented to enable remote banking transactions, then convenience and accessibility of banking services are improved, but the risk of transferring funds to incorrect accounts increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvenience of remote bankingVSAvoidaccuracy of target account
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of the target account by comparing customer-provided account information (account number, routing number, account type) against bank account records before the transfer is completed. This preliminary check confirms the account exists and belongs to the intended recipient, preventing transfers to incorrect accounts while maintaining electronic convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides immediate feedback to the customer regarding the validity of the target account information entered. The validation result (valid/invalid) is communicated back to the customer before transfer completion, allowing them to correct any errors and ensuring informed consent for the transaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If multiple database lookups are performed to validate account information, then the accuracy of target account validation is improved, but the transaction processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation accuracyVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The validation process is segmented into distinct components: extracting account information from customer input, performing database lookups for verification, and generating validation results. This segmentation allows the system to efficiently manage the multi-step validation process while maintaining accuracy across multiple data points (account number, routing number, account type).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If the system requires customer confirmation through an activatable element, then the security against unauthorized transfers is improved, but the complexity of the transfer process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity of transferVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system presents the validation result to the customer and requires explicit confirmation (via an activatable element such as a button or checkbox) before proceeding with the transfer. This preliminary confirmation step ensures the customer verifies the target account is correct and intentionally authorizes the transfer, adding a security layer without significantly complicating the overall process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250245658A1Systems and methods for validating client account data
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC
  • US20250245658A1 patent drawing
  • US20250245658A1 patent drawing
  • US20250245658A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for validating target account data based on inputs from a user. The system may include a memory storing instructions, and a processor configured to execute the instructions to perform operations. The operations may include providing an interface; receiving a first input; receiving a second input; enabling selection of an activatable element; conducting a lookup associated with the received inputs; receiving a result of the lookup; transforming the result of the lookup into a transformed result that predicts the probability of verification; and displaying transformed result to demonstrate the validity of the received inputs.