Client Intake Risk Parameters for Automated Conflict Checks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing client intake systems rely on personal knowledge and require significant human intervention and time for conflict checks, often taking 24 hours and using legacy databases.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for client intake and management that includes a central server and user terminals, utilizing hierarchical searching and data retrieval from multiple sources to determine client risk and conflict ratings automatically, reducing human intervention and processing time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing client intake systems use personal knowledge and legacy databases for conflict checks, then they can identify client risks, but the process requires significant human intervention and takes 24 hours

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveclient risk identification accuracyVSAvoidconflict check duration

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and storing client data in structured databases before conflict checks are needed. Client information, risk factors, and conflict indicators are organized in advance, enabling rapid retrieval and analysis during actual conflict checks without requiring manual research

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual human analysis and personal knowledge assessment with automated computer-based systems. The system uses algorithms to analyze client data, generate risk parameters, and determine conflict ratings automatically, substituting human cognitive processes with computational methods that operate continuously without fatigue or bias

Inventive Principle:

Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If existing systems rely on manual conflict checks and personal knowledge, then they can assess client risk, but significant human intervention is required

Engineering Contradiction:

Improverisk assessment capabilityVSAvoidhuman intervention requirement

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically performing conflict checks and risk assessments without requiring human operators. The automated system retrieves data, analyzes risk factors, generates parameters, and produces conflict ratings independently, freeing human users from manual intervention while maintaining consistent and reliable assessment quality

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where risk assessment results are automatically fed back into the database to refine future assessments. The system continuously learns from accumulated data, adjusting risk parameters and conflict ratings based on patterns identified through automated analysis, thereby improving reliability while reducing human involvement

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated systems are implemented for conflict checks, then processing time is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveconflict check processing speedVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the conflict check system into distinct functional modules: data retrieval module, data processing module, risk parameter generation module, and conflict rating module. Each module handles a specific aspect of the process, allowing independent optimization and maintenance while collectively achieving high productivity through coordinated automated operation

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12602637B2Systems and methods for client intake and management using risk parameters

Publication Date: 2026.04.14 ACI HLDG LTD

AI summary

Systems and methods for client intake and management are disclosed herein. In an. embodiment, a method for client intake and management by a first party includes receiving initial client data regarding a second party from at least one user terminal, retrieving additional client data regarding the second party from at least one of the second party, an existing second party database, or a third party data source, extracting target data from the additional client data, generating at least one risk parameter based on the target data, and determining a risk associated with the second party based on the at least one risk parameter.