On-Device Generative AI Task Routing Under Resource Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing AI models consume large computational resources, limiting their execution on smaller devices and leading to inefficiencies and resource conflicts, while server-based execution increases infrastructure and network usage and raises data privacy concerns.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that determines which tasks can be performed by AI models on smaller client devices versus server devices, optimizing resource usage and reducing network data transfer by executing portions of tasks locally.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If AI models are executed on server devices, then computational power and model capabilities are improved, but infrastructure costs and network usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational powerVSAvoidinfrastructure energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments AI workload into two parts: lightweight tasks executed locally on client devices and complex tasks executed on server devices. This segmentation allows the system to leverage client device resources for simple operations while reserving server resources for computationally intensive tasks, thereby reducing overall infrastructure energy consumption while maintaining necessary computational power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism that determines which tasks should be executed locally versus on the server. This intermediary decision layer optimizes resource allocation by analyzing task characteristics and routing them appropriately, reducing unnecessary server infrastructure energy consumption while ensuring complex tasks still receive adequate computational power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If AI models are executed on client devices, then data privacy and security are improved, but computational resource constraints limit model capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata privacy riskVSAvoidcomputational power
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments task execution based on data sensitivity and computational requirements. Sensitive tasks that require data privacy are executed locally on client devices using lightweight models, while less sensitive but computationally intensive tasks are sent to servers. This segmentation maintains data privacy for sensitive operations while overcoming local device computational limitations for complex tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by executing only the necessary computational operations locally on client devices rather than requiring full-power models everywhere. Lightweight models are deployed on client devices specifically for tasks requiring data privacy, while full-power models remain on servers for tasks where data privacy is less critical, optimizing the balance between privacy and computational power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If existing AI models are deployed on smaller devices, then device accessibility is improved, but computational resource conflicts and inefficiencies occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice accessibilityVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of model size and complexity based on device capabilities. Instead of deploying full-power models on all devices regardless of specifications, the system adapts model parameters (size, complexity, architecture) to match the computational resources available on each device, improving both accessibility and efficiency simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the AI model execution strategy based on device type and task requirements. Different model variants are deployed on different device tiers, with lightweight models on consumer devices and full-power models on powerful devices or servers. This segmentation eliminates resource conflicts by matching appropriate models to appropriate platforms while maintaining broad accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260080224A1Systems and methods for on-device artificial intelligence
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20260080224A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080224A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080224A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for on-device artificial intelligence (AI) includes obtaining, at a client device, a request to perform a task. The method includes providing the request as input to a generative AI model operating on the client device. The generative AI model may be trained to identify one or more applications capable of performing the task and to generate instructions related to the task for the one or more applications. The method includes causing the instructions related to the task to be provided to the one or more applications. The method includes receiving an indication of completion of at least a portion of the task. The method includes providing, at the client device, information regarding the completion of the at least a portion of the task.