Client Type Detection via Protocol Fingerprinting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional systems that rely on self-reported client type information are vulnerable to spoofing, allowing attackers and non-compliant users to circumvent security policies, necessitating a more robust method to detect client types accurately.

Innovation Solution

The method involves analyzing client network protocol implementations for distinctive fingerprints to determine client types, using a protocol implementation database that correlates protocol characteristics with client types, and restricting access based on these determinations, while also detecting user agent spoofing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If self-reported client type information is accepted from client systems, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to spoofing vulnerability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary verification mechanism that does not directly trust client-reported information. Instead, it uses protocol analysis as a mediator to independently verify client type claims by examining actual network protocol behavior patterns, thereby resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical approach of accepting self-reported client type strings with a more sophisticated protocol-based verification system. It substitutes client assertion with protocol behavior analysis, examining actual network communications to determine client type, thus eliminating spoofing vulnerability while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If protocol implementation analysis is performed to detect client types, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the protocol implementation analysis into distinct manageable components: identifying protocol characteristics, comparing against known patterns, and determining client type. This segmentation allows complex verification to be broken down into simpler, more manageable steps that can be systematically executed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the verification parameter from client-reported string identifiers to protocol behavior characteristics. By analyzing multiple protocol parameters (timing, sequencing, error handling patterns) rather than relying on single client-provided values, the system achieves higher reliability through diversified measurement dimensions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If user agent spoofing detection is implemented, then security is improved, but measurement precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where protocol behavior analysis results are fed back to verify or challenge client type claims. The system continuously monitors protocol communications and uses this feedback to detect inconsistencies between reported and actual client behavior, enabling precise spoofing detection through iterative verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite verification approach that combines multiple protocol characteristic analyses (HTTP headers, TCP handshakes, error responses, timing patterns) to form a comprehensive client type determination. This composite material of verification evidence provides both security and measurement precision by cross-validating multiple independent indicators

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS9122869B1Systems and methods for detecting client types
Publication Date: 2015.09.01 CA TECH INC
  • US9122869B1 patent drawing
  • US9122869B1 patent drawing
  • US9122869B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for detecting client types may include identifying a communication from a client system transmitted according to a network protocol, analyzing the communication to determine at least one protocol implementation characteristic that describes how the client system implemented the network protocol in the communication, submitting the protocol implementation characteristic to a protocol implementation database that correlates client types with protocol implementation characteristics and receiving, in response to submitting the protocol implementation characteristic, a client type of the client system. Various other methods, systems, and computer-readable media are also disclosed.