Method and assembly for comparing a room temperature with air-conditioning preferences of room users

Solution Overview

Problem

Centralized climate control systems in offices often fail to meet the individual temperature and comfort preferences of all users, leading to unsatisfactory conditions and slow response times, especially in open-plan settings.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that compares room climate preferences with user inputs, using a simulator to determine energy-efficient user distributions and position assignments, leveraging sensors, digital building models, and historical data to minimize energy expenditure and optimize user comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If centralized climate control is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but individual user comfort requirements cannot be met

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the open-plan office into multiple thermal zones based on user preferences and occupancy patterns. Each zone can be independently controlled to meet specific user requirements, transforming a single centralized control system into multiple localized control regions that adapt to individual needs while maintaining overall system coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements local quality control by allowing different temperature settings in different zones of the same room. Users can specify their preferred temperature ranges, and the system creates localized climate conditions that match individual preferences rather than enforcing a uniform temperature throughout the entire space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If individual local climate control is implemented, then user preferences are better met, but overall room climate stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by implementing a hierarchical control structure where local zone controllers operate autonomously to meet individual preferences, while simultaneously participating in a global coordination mechanism that maintains overall room climate stability. The control system serves multiple functions: local temperature regulation, global climate balance, and adaptive response to occupancy changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where sensors continuously monitor temperature, humidity, and occupancy in each zone. This real-time data feeds back to the control system, which automatically adjusts climate parameters to maintain stability while accommodating user preferences. The feedback loop ensures that individual zone adjustments do not create instability in the overall room environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If climate control systems respond quickly, then user comfort is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting user arrival and climate needs in advance. When occupancy is detected or predicted, the system pre-adjusts the climate in relevant zones before users actually arrive or need the environmental change. This anticipatory control reduces the need for rapid, high-energy responses while still delivering timely comfort improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic monitoring and adjustment cycles rather than continuous high-intensity climate control. The system checks occupancy and climate conditions at regular intervals, making adjustments only when necessary. This periodic operation reduces overall energy consumption while maintaining adequate response times to user needs through strategic timing of climate modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20240410605A1Method and assembly for comparing a room temperature with air-conditioning preferences of room users
Publication Date: 2024.12.12
  • US20240410605A1 patent drawing
  • US20240410605A1 patent drawing
  • US20240410605A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Air-conditioning preferences of room users are read in order to compare a room temperature with air-conditioning preferences of the room users. Additionally, factors influencing the room temperature are detected and fed to a simulator in order to simulate the room temperature. A respective energy requirement for adapting the room temperature to the air-conditioning preferences is simulated by the simulator on the basis of the detected influencing factors for different distributions of room users in the room. An energy-saving distribution of the room users is then ascertained on the basis of the simulated energy requirement. Position allotment information for room users is also output according to the energy-saving distribution.