Automated sweat prevention for climate control systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Climate control systems face challenges in preventing condensate formation on exterior surfaces, particularly in humid environments, which can lead to equipment deterioration and damage, with existing solutions either passively managing moisture or failing to actively mitigate sweating effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize environmental and climate control system information to assess the likelihood of condensate formation, adjusting operational settings to prevent sweating by monitoring temperature and humidity conditions and entering a sweat prevention mode, which involves adjusting the minimum capacity settings of the climate control system to reduce condensate formation on exterior surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If substantial insulation is added to prevent sweating, then condensate formation is reduced, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecondensate formationVSAvoidinsulation addition
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters (compressor capacity, fan speed, refrigerant flow) to control heat exchanger surface temperature, keeping it above dew point to prevent condensate formation without adding insulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The controller continuously monitors environmental conditions (temperature, humidity) and adjusts system operation in real-time based on feedback, enabling active sweat prevention through dynamic parameter adjustment rather than passive insulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If the system operates at lower capacity to improve efficiency, then energy consumption decreases, but the likelihood of condensate formation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidcondensate formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts capacity settings based on real-time environmental conditions, transitioning between low-capacity efficient operation and higher-capacity sweat-prevention mode when condensate risk is detected, optimizing both energy efficiency and sweat prevention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller proactively increases capacity before condensate formation occurs by monitoring environmental conditions and predicting sweat risk, preventing the harmful effect before it manifests while minimizing energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If minimum capacity settings are increased to prevent sweating, then condensate formation is reduced, but system productivity and energy efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecondensate formationVSAvoidsystem efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system periodically monitors environmental conditions and intermittently applies sweat prevention mode only when necessary, rather than continuous high-capacity operation, maintaining productivity while preventing condensate formation during critical periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively minimizes condensate formation on exterior surfaces while maintaining comfort and efficiency, reducing the risk of equipment damage and extending the lifespan of climate control system components.

Implementation Method 1

determine if condensate will likely form on an exterior surface of the climate control system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 2

utilize environmental and climate control system information to assess a likelihood that condensate will form on components of the system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS20240318863A1Automated sweat prevention for climate control systems
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 TRANE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US20240318863A1 patent drawing
  • US20240318863A1 patent drawing
  • US20240318863A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples of the present disclosure relate to systems and methods for monitoring the conditions that contribute to condensate formation along exterior surfaces of climate control systems and components thereof located in humid unconditioned spaces. Examples also relate to determining a likelihood of condensate formation and then providing measures to reduce or prevent condensate formation in the humid unconditioned space. Some examples for determining the conditions include utilizing temperature and humidity sensors with the climate control system and components thereof located in the humid unconditioned space. Some examples include monitoring conditions of the humid unconditioned space with sensors and then estimating conditions along the exterior component surfaces using calculations. Based on the conditions of the climate control system and of the unconditioned space the climate control system may operate with adjusted minimum settings to reduce the likelihood of condensate formation.