Climbing Wall Framework With Adjustable Panel Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Complex climbing walls require a time-consuming and expensive installation process due to intricate truss assemblies, limiting the variety and placement of climbing planes and handholds, and are rarely altered once constructed.

Innovation Solution

A climbing wall framework with adjustable connectors, braces, and variable-angle front posts, allowing for versatile mounting of surface panels and holds, enabling easy reconfiguration and creation of diverse climbing geometries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional truss assemblies with straight components are used, then structural stability is provided, but the variety and placement of climbing planes are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariety of climbing planesVSAvoidtruss assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The climbing wall is divided into modular surface panels that can be independently configured and attached to the framework. Each panel can be positioned at different angles and locations, allowing multiple climbing planes without requiring a completely custom truss assembly for each configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The framework incorporates adjustable connectors and variable-angle front posts that allow the geometry of climbing planes to be changed after construction. This dynamic adjustability enables the same structural framework to support various climbing plane configurations without requiring complex custom-built trusses for each design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If complex truss assemblies are constructed on-site with multiple components, then structural stability is achieved, but installation time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The framework components, including front posts with integrated connectors and bracing elements, are pre-configured and prepared before on-site assembly. This preliminary preparation reduces the complexity and time required for on-site construction while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple functions are combined into single components: front posts integrate both structural support and panel mounting capabilities, while connectors combine securing and positioning functions. This consolidation reduces the number of separate components that need to be assembled on-site, decreasing installation time and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Stability of the object's composition

If surface panels are cut to very specific dimensions, then tight fitting at intersections is achieved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel fitting precisionVSAvoidpanel manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Surface panels are designed with standardized dimensions and features that allow them to be used in multiple positions and configurations. The universal panel design eliminates the need for custom-cut panels for each specific location, simplifying manufacturing while maintaining tight fits through the standardized connector system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Strength

If traditional metal substructures are used beneath surface panels, then structural support is provided, but the placement of handholds is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidhandhold placement flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

A buffer layer is introduced between the metal substructure and the climbing surface. This intermediary buffer (made of softer material like wood) allows handholds to be positioned directly over the metal support without being constrained by its location, providing both structural strength and placement flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260071429A1Climbing wall assemblies
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 EVERLAST CLIMBING IND INC
  • US20260071429A1 patent drawing
  • US20260071429A1 patent drawing
  • US20260071429A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to climbing wall assemblies having a variety of improvements. For instance, the climbing wall assemblies may include connectors to attach the surface panels to the framework, in which the connectors may be mounted substantially anywhere along the front of the framework and at substantially any angle, providing for the securement of climbing panels in various geometries. The climbing wall assemblies may also include braces that may easily be adjusted to a desired length and configuration during construction of a climbing wall. The climbing wall assemblies may also include variable-angle, integral front posts, which provide for the easy and stable securement of climbing panels in various geometries. These improvements provide climbing wall assemblies that may be easily assembled to produce a desirable climbing wall structure having few framework components.