Clinical Decision Support Using Fused Neural Features for Ablation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for diagnosing and treating arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation, rely on standardized protocols that do not account for individual patient characteristics, leading to suboptimal treatment outcomes and frequent recurrences despite advances in ablation technology.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based system that integrates multiple types of patient data, including ECGs, EGMs, cardiac imaging, and patient history, to provide clinical decision support for ablation procedures, including pre-, during-, and post-procedure guidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If standardized protocols are used for arrhythmia diagnosis and treatment, then treatment consistency is improved, but individual patient characteristics are not accounted for leading to suboptimal outcomes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment consistencyVSAvoidindividual patient customization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different analysis methods and weighting to different patient-specific data features (ECG patterns, anatomical structures, physiological parameters) while maintaining standardized processing pipelines. Each patient receives a customized treatment recommendation based on their specific data profile, allowing local adaptation without sacrificing overall system reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs comprehensive data collection and analysis before treatment decision-making, creating detailed patient profiles that inform personalized treatment planning. Pre-procedure, intra-procedure, and post-procedure analyses are conducted in advance to prepare customized treatment pathways for each patient

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If manual interpretation of cardiac signals is used, then clinical judgment is applied, but data integration is limited leading to suboptimal treatment outcomes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclinical judgment applicationVSAvoiddata integration capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple data sources including ECG signals, EGM recordings, cardiac imaging data, and clinical metadata into a unified analysis framework. Multiple deep neural networks process different data modalities simultaneously and integrate their outputs to provide comprehensive treatment recommendations that preserve both automated analysis capabilities and clinical judgment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary AI layer that processes raw cardiac signals and clinical data, then presents processed insights to clinicians for final decision-making. This intermediary layer enhances rather than replaces clinical judgment by providing synthesized information from multiple data sources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If ablation procedures are performed without personalized guidance, then procedural efficiency is maintained, but recurrence rates remain frequent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedural efficiencyVSAvoidtreatment effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops during ablation procedures, analyzing real-time ECG and EGM data to assess lesion formation and treatment effectiveness. Intra-procedure and post-procedure analyses provide feedback on treatment outcomes, allowing clinicians to adjust procedures to prevent recurrence while maintaining efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static treatment protocols to dynamic, adaptive treatment planning that adjusts recommendations based on real-time patient response and outcome data. Treatment plans are continuously refined based on accumulated clinical experience and individual patient responses to ablation therapy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12387852B2Apparatus and method for generating clinical decision support
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 ANUMANA INC
  • US12387852B2 patent drawing
  • US12387852B2 patent drawing
  • US12387852B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and method for generating clinical decision support is disclosed. The apparatus includes at least a processor and a computer-readable storage medium communicatively connected to the at least a processor, wherein the computer-readable storage medium contains instructions configuring the at least processor to receive user data, generate a fused feature vector correlating the user data to a plurality of clinical outcomes by training a plurality of deep neural networks (DNNs) to output a first set of feature vectors, a second set of feature vectors and a third set of feature vectors, fusing the first, second, and third set of features vectors to form the fused feature vector, generate a procedural output using the fused feature vector, and display the procedural output through a user interface.