Clinical Decision Support System for Personalized Imaging Referrals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current clinical decision support systems in medical diagnostics are limited in their ability to provide patient-specific guidance for diagnostic imaging referrals, often resulting in inappropriate or unnecessary imaging procedures due to a one-size-fits-all approach and lack of integration with referral systems, leading to diagnostic errors and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A clinical decision support system that utilizes patient-specific data, including demographic, medical, and non-medical information, to predict the propensity for health conditions and dynamically update guidelines, providing a hierarchy of diagnostic test usefulness and reducing unnecessary procedures through AI-driven analysis and machine learning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If current clinical decision support systems use general guidelines for diagnostic imaging referrals, then the guidelines are easy to access and apply, but they fail to provide patient-specific guidance resulting in inappropriate or unnecessary imaging procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of guideline accessVSAvoidpatient-specific guidance accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from generic guidelines to personalized recommendations by analyzing individual patient characteristics including demographic data, medical history, and clinical presentation. Each patient receives customized imaging referral guidance based on their unique profile, ensuring that the quality of guidance is tailored to local patient needs rather than applying a uniform approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts guideline recommendations based on varying patient parameters such as age, sex, medical history, and clinical symptoms. By changing the parameters of guideline application according to individual patient characteristics, the system maintains ease of access while significantly improving patient-specific guidance accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If clinical decision support systems integrate comprehensive patient data analysis, then patient-specific guidance accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient-specific guidance accuracyVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the complex task of patient data analysis into separate functional modules: data collection components, analysis components, and recommendation generation components. Each module processes specific types of data (demographic, medical history, clinical) independently before integrating results, thereby managing system complexity while maintaining comprehensive patient-specific guidance accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer that bridges raw patient data and final recommendations. This intermediary component standardizes and pre-processes data from multiple sources before it reaches the recommendation engine, simplifying the overall system architecture while enabling accurate patient-specific guidance through comprehensive data analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If the system provides detailed personalized recommendations for each patient, then diagnostic accuracy improves, but the time required for decision support increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic imaging accuracyVSAvoiddecision support time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data processing and analysis before the clinician needs recommendations. Patient data is pre-collected, pre-processed, and pre-analyzed against the knowledge base in advance, so that when a diagnostic decision is needed, the system can quickly retrieve and present personalized recommendations without requiring time-consuming real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified representations or copies of complex patient data profiles that capture essential characteristics needed for recommendation generation. By working with these condensed data representations rather than raw comprehensive data during the decision-making process, the system maintains diagnostic accuracy while significantly reducing the time required for decision support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Stability of the object's composition

If the system uses static guidelines updated periodically, then the guidelines are stable and easy to maintain, but they cannot adapt to location-specific and context-aware data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguideline stabilityVSAvoidcontext-aware adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms static guidelines into dynamic, adaptive recommendations that automatically adjust based on location-specific data and contextual information. The recommendation engine continuously learns from new data patterns and contextual factors, allowing the system to adapt to changing medical landscapes, geographic variations, and specific patient contexts while maintaining overall guideline stability through a structured knowledge base.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240363256A1Method and system for selecting a clinical pathway
Publication Date: 2024.10.31 XWAVE TECH LTD
  • US20240363256A1 patent drawing
  • US20240363256A1 patent drawing
  • US20240363256A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A clinical decision support system and method provides a practitioner with an indication of individual specific prospective usefulness of a referral. The practitioner is provided with individual-specific indication of prospective usefulness of findings for a referral, wherein comparative and statistical input data is supplemented by nuanced data to predict the usefulness of findings from optional and/or select subsequent diagnostic tests relative to individual specific propensity for a condition/disease.