Clinical Decision Support Platform for Cost-Quality Pathway Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern medicine's increased complexity and variety of treatment options can lead to suboptimal care plans for patients, as existing systems lack the ability to tailor care plans dynamically based on individual patient factors and costs.

Innovation Solution

A point-of-care clinical decision support platform with a graphical user interface and extensible API architecture that extracts electronic medical records, guidelines, and cost information to generate personalized clinical pathways, allowing clinicians to tune care plans using parameters such as cost, time, and risk assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple treatment options and care plans are provided to address medical conditions, then the quality and variety of care improve, but the complexity of care and difficulty of selecting optimal plans increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariety of treatment optionsVSAvoidcomplexity of care
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by dynamically adjusting care plan recommendations based on multiple variables including patient-specific factors (age, gender, comorbidities), clinical guidelines, cost parameters, and outcome metrics. The controller modifies treatment parameters in real-time to optimize the balance between care quality and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary between the complex medical knowledge base and the clinician decision-making process. It translates numerous treatment options and guidelines into simplified, personalized care pathway recommendations, reducing the cognitive burden on clinicians while maintaining access to comprehensive care options

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive electronic medical record information and guidelines are extracted and analyzed, then the accuracy of care recommendations improves, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of care recommendationsVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and structuring electronic medical record data and clinical guidelines before they are needed for decision-making. Care pathways and recommendation templates are prepared in advance, allowing rapid retrieval and customization during clinical encounters without extensive real-time processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller extracts only the most relevant information from comprehensive electronic medical records and guidelines based on the specific patient context and clinical question. It selectively pulls out critical data elements rather than processing entire datasets, reducing computation time while maintaining recommendation accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If cost information is integrated into clinical decision-making, then the ability to reconcile quality and cost of care improves, but the complexity of the decision support system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to balance quality and costVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller serves multiple functions simultaneously: it analyzes clinical data, applies clinical guidelines, calculates cost parameters, and generates personalized care recommendations. This multi-functionality is achieved through a unified architecture that handles both clinical and economic decision-making without requiring separate systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates cost as a可调 parameter alongside clinical effectiveness metrics. By treating cost as another dimension in the optimization problem rather than a separate constraint, the system can dynamically balance quality and cost based on patient needs and resource availability without adding significant complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12148528B1Point-of-care clinical decision support platform
Publication Date: 2024.11.19 CARDINAL HEALTH COMMERCIAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US12148528B1 patent drawing
  • US12148528B1 patent drawing
  • US12148528B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A medical decision system comprises a platform having a graphical user interface, an electronic record interface, a guideline interface, and a parameter cost interface. Moreover, a controller of the platform performance tunes a clinical pathway for a patient receiving medical care. Essentially, the controller selects an electronic patient identifier corresponding to the patient receiving medical care, extracts, via the electronic record interface, electronic medical record information associated with the selected electronic patient identifier, extracts, via the guideline interface, guidelines associated with medical care of the patient associated with the electronic patient identifier, and extracts, via the parameter cost interface, cost information associated with the extracted electronic medical record information and the extracted guidelines. In this manner, the controller generates a clinical pathway that recommends a future clinical service reconciled with actual costs of care extracted from the cost information, where the generated clinical pathway is based upon a tuning parameter.