Clinical Decision Support System for Multidisciplinary Team Data Synthesis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multidisciplinary teams in healthcare face challenges in efficiently reviewing and making decisions due to the vast and diverse amount of patient data, leading to potential delays and inappropriate decisions due to incomplete or unavailable information, lack of structured decision-making processes, and reliance on personal experiences rather than latest clinical guidelines.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses encoded guidelines to identify and generate patient management options and recommendations based on available data, providing a structured decision-making process, storing decision history, and allowing for commentary and dissent recording, thus facilitating evidence-based decision-making and corporate memory.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multidisciplinary teams manually assemble and review patient data, then clinical decisions can be made with human expertise, but the process is time-consuming and prone to information oversight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision accuracyVSAvoiddecision time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically gathering, organizing, and presenting relevant patient data and management options before the MDT meeting. This includes retrieving data from multiple sources, applying clinical guidelines to generate recommended options, and preparing comprehensive reports in advance, allowing the team to focus on decision-making rather than data collection during the meeting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary between diverse data sources and the MDT clinicians. It automatically retrieves data from electronic health records, imaging systems, and other sources, processes this information through encoded clinical guidelines, and presents synthesized management options with recommendations, thereby mediating the complex information flow and reducing manual effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If all relevant patient data is collected and reviewed, then decision accuracy improves, but the complexity of data management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision accuracyVSAvoiddata management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the relevant patient data and information needed for specific management decisions from the vast array of available data sources. It uses encoded clinical guidelines to identify and retrieve only the necessary information, excluding irrelevant data, thereby reducing data management complexity while maintaining decision accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the complex data management process into distinct automated components: data retrieval from multiple sources, data validation and organization, application of clinical guidelines, generation of management options, and presentation of results. This segmentation simplifies the overall complexity by breaking down the monolithic task into manageable automated steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Stability of the object's composition

If structured decision-making processes are implemented, then consistency and reproducibility improve, but the ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision process consistencyVSAvoidprocess simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides self-service by automatically applying encoded clinical guidelines and generating management options without requiring manual configuration or complex user interactions. The structured decision-making process is embedded in the system itself, which autonomously retrieves data, applies guidelines, and presents options, thereby maintaining consistency while preserving ease of operation for clinicians.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If encoded guidelines are used to generate management options, then evidence-based decision-making is achieved, but the adaptability to individual cases may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevidence-based accuracyVSAvoidcase-specific flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamics by allowing the application of encoded clinical guidelines to be flexible and adaptive to individual patient cases. While the guidelines provide structured evidence-based recommendations, the system can accommodate case-specific variations by retrieving patient-specific data and generating customized management options that reflect both guideline recommendations and individual patient characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8527293B2Method and system for supporting clinical decision-making
Publication Date: 2013.09.03 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US8527293B2 patent drawing
  • US8527293B2 patent drawing
  • US8527293B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system are provided for facilitating decision making, such as in a clinical setting. In accordance with this technique, a set of encoded guidelines are executed to identify information that may be used to generate patient management options. The information is acquired, if available. Based on the encoded guidelines and the acquired information, a set of patient management options are generated and provided to one or more reviewers for review and selection of a patient management option.