Clinical Decision Support System for Unstructured Data Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current question answering technologies, such as DeepQA, face challenges in adapting to specialized domains like medicine, where they must efficiently process vast amounts of unstructured information, provide accurate and confident answers, and assist in differential diagnosis while overcoming cognitive overload and the limitations of existing clinical decision support systems.

Innovation Solution

The DeepQA system uses natural language processing and search techniques to analyze unstructured information, generate hypotheses, and score evidence, providing a flexible and scalable architecture for clinical decision support by extracting relevant information from electronic medical records and other sources, and allowing for mixed-initiative dialogue to explore missing information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If DeepQA processes vast amounts of unstructured information from electronic medical records, then diagnostic accuracy and completeness improve, but system complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of processing vast amounts of unstructured medical information into distinct modules: information extraction, hypothesis generation, evidence scoring, and decision support. Each module handles a specific aspect of the diagnostic process, making the overall system more manageable while maintaining high diagnostic accuracy through specialized processing at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer between raw unstructured medical records and final diagnostic decisions. This intermediary processing layer includes natural language processing components and evidence evaluation mechanisms that bridge the gap between raw data and clinical decision-making, filtering and transforming information to reduce complexity while preserving diagnostic accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the system provides comprehensive evidence exploration and hypothesis generation, then diagnostic thoroughness improves, but cognitive overload on the user increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic thoroughnessVSAvoidcognitive load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that dynamically adjust the amount and type of information presented to users based on their interactions and diagnostic progress. The evidence scoring and hypothesis generation components provide targeted feedback that guides users through the diagnostic process, presenting only the most relevant information at each stage and reducing cognitive overload while maintaining comprehensive evidence exploration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by tailoring the information presentation to specific diagnostic contexts and user needs. Rather than presenting all available evidence uniformly, the system prioritizes and presents evidence locally relevant to the current diagnostic hypothesis, making the comprehensive information manageable and reducing cognitive load through selective information delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If existing clinical decision support systems are used, then some decision support is provided, but they fail to process unstructured information effectively and lack flexibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision support capabilityVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal decision support system that can handle multiple types of medical information (structured and unstructured) and adapt to various diagnostic scenarios. The system's modular architecture with interchangeable processing components enables it to flexibly handle different medical domains and diagnostic tasks, providing both decision support capability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates dynamic adaptability through its hypothesis generation and evidence scoring mechanisms that evolve based on user input and diagnostic context. The system can dynamically adjust its processing strategies and information presentation based on the specific diagnostic challenge, making it flexible and adaptable to diverse medical scenarios while maintaining strong decision support capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9153142B2User interface for an evidence-based, hypothesis-generating decision support system
Publication Date: 2015.10.06 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9153142B2 patent drawing
  • US9153142B2 patent drawing
  • US9153142B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods display at least one subject, and display a location for at least one user to enter at least one problem related to the subject. The problem comprises unknown items to which the user would like more information. In response to the problem, such systems and methods automatically generate evidence topics related to the problem, and automatically generate questions related to the problem and the evidence topics. Further, such systems and methods can receive additional questions from the user. In response to the questions, such systems and methods automatically generate answers to the questions by referring to sources, automatically calculate confidence measures of each of the answers, and then display the questions, the answers, and the confidence measures. When the user identifies one of the answers as a selected answer, such systems and methods display details of the sources and the factors used to generate the selected answer.