Clinical Deterioration Detection via Multivariate Vital Sign Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current clinical monitoring systems rely on manual and infrequent data collection, leading to inadequate detection of clinical deterioration events due to insufficient sensitivity and complexity in interpreting vital sign trends, resulting in low detection rates and high false alarm rates.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for continuous real-time monitoring of vital signs using sensors to detect clinical deterioration events through clinically validated subroutines, which analyze and validate data from multiple parameters, including ECG, PPG, heart rate, and oxygen saturation, and generate alarms based on intelligent algorithms to reduce false alarms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual and infrequent data collection is used, then resource allocation is reduced, but detection rate of clinical deterioration events is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection rateVSAvoidtime to detect deterioration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical data collection and interpretation with an automated computer-implemented system that continuously collects vital sign data, applies clinically validated algorithms, and generates alerts. This substitution enables 24/7 monitoring without human intervention, dramatically improving detection rates while eliminating the time loss associated with manual assessment intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous monitoring of vital signs without interruption, maintaining constant surveillance of patient status. This continuous action ensures that clinical deterioration events are detected immediately when they occur, rather than waiting for periodic manual assessments, thereby eliminating detection delays while sustaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Ease of operation

If simple threshold alerts are used, then alarm generation is simplified, but false alarm rate is high causing alarm fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm generation simplicityVSAvoidalarm accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the alarm generation approach by changing from single-parameter threshold alerts to a multivariate analysis system that evaluates multiple vital sign parameters simultaneously. The clinically validated algorithms assess patterns, trends, and combinations of parameters (heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation) to generate alerts only when clinically significant deterioration is detected, thereby maintaining simplicity while dramatically improving reliability and reducing false alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where alert generation is based on dynamic assessment of vital sign trends and patterns rather than static thresholds. The clinically validated algorithms continuously adjust their assessment based on patient-specific baselines and physiological relationships between parameters, providing intelligent feedback that distinguishes true deterioration from normal variations, thus reducing false alarms while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If manual clinical interpretation of threshold values is performed, then system complexity is reduced, but sensitivity and sophistication of event detection is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoiddetection sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex detection task into distinct clinically validated algorithms, each specialized for detecting specific types of clinical deterioration (e.g., sepsis, respiratory failure, cardiac events). This segmentation allows the system to incorporate sophisticated multivariate analysis and pattern recognition for each specific condition while maintaining manageable overall system complexity through modular, standardized algorithmic components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240374136A1System and method for automatic detection of clinical deterioration events
Publication Date: 2024.11.14 BISPEBJERG HOSPITAL
  • US20240374136A1 patent drawing
  • US20240374136A1 patent drawing
  • US20240374136A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are a clinical support system and associated method for automatic real-time detection of clinical deterioration events in a patient. Existing clinical support systems typically rely on alarm generation based on simple threshold values. This often results in too many alarms, including false alarms, which consequently results in alarm fatigue in the medical staff or in the ignoring of the alarms. The presently disclosed system and method provides an alternative to existing clinical support systems, since it incorporates clinically validated computer-implemented subroutines that provides a higher predictive value to the medical staff. The subroutines utilize thresholds and time durations, which have been clinically evaluated such that false alarms are reduced while keeping the most relevant alarms, i.e. alarms that require clinical action. Further disclosed is a computer program configured to execute the disclosed method, thereby providing automatic real-time detection of clinical deterioration events in a patient.