Real-Time Clinical Feedback System for Behavior Change

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current clinical decision support, analytics, and reporting tools are insufficient in providing credible performance metrics and feedback, leading to improper evaluation and lack of actionable insights for physicians, resulting in frustrating situations such as high-risk patient mismanagement and unexplained readmissions.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses machine learning algorithms to identify key performance metrics impacting clinical outcomes and generates real-time actionable feedback, allowing for personalized adjustments and behavior change suggestions, enabling hospitals to improve quality and reduce costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If traditional performance metrics are used to evaluate physicians, then evaluation can be performed, but the metrics are insufficient and do not provide actionable feedback for behavior change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactionable feedback informationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism that provides physicians with real-time performance metrics and actionable recommendations. The feedback loop includes: (1) collecting clinical care data, (2) analyzing it against performance metrics, (3) generating personalized feedback reports with specific recommendations, and (4) enabling physicians to view and respond to this feedback. This resolves the technical contradiction by transforming traditional static metrics into dynamic, actionable feedback while managing system complexity through automated analysis algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables physicians to self-evaluate their performance by providing them with access to their own performance metrics, practice patterns, and personalized recommendations. The feedback portal allows physicians to independently review their data, understand their performance relative to peers, and make informed decisions about their practice without requiring external evaluation. This self-service approach addresses the information loss by empowering physicians with their own performance data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If comprehensive performance tracking is implemented, then actionable feedback can be provided, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback accuracyVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the performance tracking into distinct modular components: (1) data collection modules for different clinical metrics, (2) analysis modules that process data against performance standards, (3) feedback generation modules that create personalized reports, and (4) delivery modules that present information to physicians. This segmentation improves reliability by ensuring each component performs its specific function accurately while managing overall system complexity through modularity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts performance metrics and evaluation parameters based on clinical context, provider specialty, and available data. Rather than using fixed universal metrics, the system adapts its analysis parameters to provide meaningful feedback for each physician's specific practice pattern and patient population. This parameter adaptation enhances feedback accuracy while managing complexity through algorithmic flexibility rather than rigid system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If real-time feedback is provided to physicians, then behavior change can be encouraged, but the system requires continuous data processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback timelinessVSAvoiddata processing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data processing and analysis in advance, pre-calculating performance metrics and identifying potential areas for improvement before they are needed for feedback. By pre-processing clinical data, maintaining updated performance profiles, and anticipating feedback needs, the system can deliver timely feedback without requiring intensive real-time processing resources. This preliminary action approach resolves the contradiction between feedback timeliness and processing resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11842810B1Real-time feedback systems for tracking behavior change
Publication Date: 2023.12.12 AGATHOS INC
  • US11842810B1 patent drawing
  • US11842810B1 patent drawing
  • US11842810B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system is provided for providing real-time actionable feedback. The system comprises: a server in communication with a plurality of client devices, which server comprises a first module configured to process clinical care data using a machine learning algorithm trained model to identify: (i) performance metrics that impact a clinical care outcome in a selected field, and (ii) one or more actions that influence the performance metrics and are actionable to a selected clinical care provider; a second module for generating a real-time measurement of the one or more performance metrics of the selected clinical care provider; and a third module configured to dynamically display on the graphical user interface of a client device of the selected clinical care provider: (i) the real-time measurement of the one or more performance metrics of the selected clinical care provider, and (ii) an adjustment of the one or more actions.