Clinical Laboratory Layout Heuristic Algorithm

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The Facility Layout Problem (FLP) in clinical laboratories is complex and NP-hard, making it inefficient to find optimal layouts for medium and large-scale facilities using exact algorithms, as the number of possible arrangements becomes unrealistic due to variability in facility sizes and locations.

Innovation Solution

A heuristic algorithm is used to generate initial layouts by obtaining constraints and flow collections, sorting facilities based on flow and closeness ratings, and applying a branch and bound method to place facilities while enforcing adjacency constraints, thereby producing a manageable set of diverse solutions that can be improved upon.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If exact algorithms or static approaches are used to systematically evaluate every possible layout, then the truly optimal layout can be found, but the computational efficiency becomes extremely inefficient or entirely impossible for medium and large-scale layouts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout optimalityVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the discrete facility layout problem into a continuous space representation using a grid system. Facilities are represented as occupying continuous grid cells rather than discrete positions, enabling the use of continuous optimization algorithms. This parameter transformation allows gradient-based methods to efficiently search for near-optimal layouts without evaluating all possible discrete arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-defining the grid structure, facility dimensions, and flow matrices before optimization begins. The flow collection between facilities is pre-calculated based on operational data, and constraints are pre-established. This preliminary setup enables the heuristic algorithm to focus computational effort on the optimization phase rather than problem formulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of facilities and potential install locations increases, then the layout complexity and variety increase, but the brute force approach becomes unrealistic to solve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout flexibilityVSAvoidproblem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds a dimensional transformation by representing facility layouts in continuous grid space rather than discrete position slots. This dimensional change from discrete to continuous space allows the system to handle increased facility counts and location variations without exponentially increasing computational complexity. The continuous representation enables smooth optimization across the solution space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified representations or copies of the actual facility layout problem in the form of grid models and flow matrices. These abstracted copies capture the essential characteristics of facility positions, sizes, and flow relationships without the full complexity of real-world variations. The optimization is performed on these simplified copies, which can then be translated back to actual layout configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If facilities are placed to minimize walking time and distance, then operational efficiency improves, but the constraint satisfaction becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelaboratory efficiencyVSAvoidconstraint satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the objective function continuously evaluates layout configurations based on walking distance and flow metrics. During the optimization process, each proposed layout change is assessed against the flow collection data, and the algorithm receives feedback on whether the change improves overall efficiency. This feedback loop allows the system to iteratively refine layouts while maintaining constraint satisfaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic optimization where facility positions are not fixed but can be continuously adjusted during the optimization process. The heuristic algorithm dynamically modifies the layout configuration by moving facilities to new grid positions, rotating facilities to optimize orientation, and adjusting spacing based on real-time evaluation of efficiency metrics and constraint satisfaction. This dynamic approach allows simultaneous optimization of multiple objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3782056B1System and method for clinical laboratory layout design
Publication Date: 2023.11.22 BECKMAN COULTER INC
  • EP3782056B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3782056B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3782056B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for solving the facility layout problem using a heuristic approach allows for multiple, highly efficient solutions to be automatically generated even when dealing with medium and large scale environments. Inputs to the method include a number of facilities each having a discipline and a dimension that must be placed in a laboratory area having a dimension and an entrance. The method sorts and begins to place facilities to generate a number of partial solutions, and each partial solution can be expanded until a final solution is reached or a termination criteria is satisfied. Expanded solutions that reach a final solution are reduced to a diverse set of solutions using a diversity measure. The reduced set of diverse solutions may then be improved upon using an optimization algorithm with less concern about efficiency.