Clinical Language Understanding Engine for Structured Data Extraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Clinical documentation in healthcare institutions faces challenges in efficiently extracting and structuring clinical facts from free-form narrations by clinicians, leading to inefficiencies in data entry, storage, and retrieval, especially with the transition from paper to electronic medical records.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a clinical language understanding (CLU) engine to automatically extract discrete clinical facts from free-form narrations, re-format the text, and maintain linkages between extracted facts and their original text portions, allowing for efficient storage and retrieval of clinical data in electronic medical records.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If free-form narration is used for clinical documentation, then ease of operation is improved, but data extraction and structuring efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of documentationVSAvoiddata extraction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts discrete clinical facts from free-form narration using a CLU engine, separating structured data elements from the narrative text. This allows the system to maintain ease of free-form documentation while automatically extracting structured clinical facts for efficient storage and retrieval in electronic medical records.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If manual transcription is used for clinical notes, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocumentation accuracyVSAvoidtime for note preparation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses automatic speech recognition and CLU engines to self-process clinical narrations, converting spoken or written narratives into structured clinical facts without requiring manual transcription. This maintains accuracy through automated extraction while significantly reducing the time clinicians spend on documentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical process of manual transcription with automated computational systems including speech recognition and natural language understanding engines, eliminating the time-consuming manual typing process while maintaining documentation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If electronic medical records are implemented, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata retrieval efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex EHR system into distinct functional components: free-form narration input, automated speech recognition processing, CLU-based fact extraction, and structured data storage. This modular segmentation manages system complexity while maintaining productivity benefits of electronic records.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8738403B2Methods and apparatus for updating text in clinical documentation
Publication Date: 2014.05.27 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US8738403B2 patent drawing
  • US8738403B2 patent drawing
  • US8738403B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Based on a free-form narration of a patient encounter provided by a clinician, it may be determined that one or more clinical facts could possibly be ascertained from the patient encounter. One or more options corresponding to the one or more clinical facts may be provided to a user. A selection of a first option of the one or more options may be received from the user. The first option may correspond to a first fact of the one or more clinical facts. A textual representation of the free-form narration may be updated to identify the first fact as having been ascertained from the patient encounter.