Clinical Note Generation Using Historical Note Augmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Clinical notes generated based on doctor-patient conversations often lack important clinical information present in historical patient records, necessitating a system to incorporate this missing information.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning model is trained using historical clinical notes to generate augmented clinical notes by identifying and removing overlapping data from current notes, incorporating missing historical information, and flagging modifications for user review.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If clinical notes are generated solely based on doctor-patient conversations, then the notes can be created quickly and efficiently, but they lack important clinical information that was recorded during previous interactions with the patient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclinical note generation efficiencyVSAvoidhistorical clinical information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by proactively retrieving and analyzing historical clinical notes from the EHR before finalizing the current clinical note. This allows the system to identify and incorporate missing historical information in advance, ensuring completeness while maintaining efficient generation based on the current doctor-patient conversation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism (the clinical note augmentation system) that acts as a bridge between the current doctor-patient conversation and historical clinical records. This intermediary automatically retrieves, analyzes, and integrates relevant historical information, resolving the contradiction by enabling efficient current note generation while preventing information loss from historical records.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If historical clinical notes are manually reviewed and integrated into current clinical notes, then complete clinical information is achieved, but the process becomes time-consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehistorical clinical informationVSAvoidclinical note generation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically retrieving, analyzing, and integrating historical clinical information without requiring manual intervention. The system autonomously identifies relevant historical data, compares it with the current note, and performs the integration, thereby achieving complete clinical information while keeping the process simple and efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the manual mechanical process of reviewing and integrating historical notes with an automated computational system. This substitution eliminates the need for manual EHR searching and note synthesis, reducing process complexity while ensuring comprehensive information integration through algorithmic analysis and comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of information

If all historical clinical notes are included in the current clinical note, then information completeness is maximized, but redundancy and duplication of information occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehistorical clinical informationVSAvoidredundant information
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies the extraction principle by selectively removing redundant and duplicate information from historical clinical notes before integration. It identifies overlapping content between historical and current notes, extracts only the unique and relevant historical information, and incorporates it into the final clinical note, thereby maximizing information completeness while eliminating redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs partial action by selectively integrating only the necessary portion of historical clinical information rather than including all historical data. It performs a targeted comparison to identify specific gaps in the current note and fills only those gaps with relevant historical information, avoiding excessive inclusion of redundant content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260057983A1System and Computer-Implemented Method For Generating Clinical Notes
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 SOLVENTUM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES CO
  • US20260057983A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057983A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057983A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a non-transitory storage having stored thereon instructions that when executed by a processor cause the processor to train a machine learning model to generate clinical notes by repeatedly: receiving a plurality of clinical notes associated with a patient; selecting a final clinical note; selecting a predecessor clinical note chronologically preceding the final clinical note; determining overlapping data between the final clinical note and the predecessor clinical note; performing an action on the identified overlapping data to generate a synthesized input clinical note; providing the synthesized input clinical note and the predecessor clinical note to the machine learning model; receiving a predicted final clinical note from the machine learning model; and updating the machine learning model based on the predicted final clinical note and the final clinical note.