Automated Clinical Trial Database Lock Task Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The clinical data locking process in clinical trials is laborious and time-consuming due to the lack of efficient tracking and management of data-related issues, leading to delays in product approval and significant financial losses.

Innovation Solution

An automated method for managing database locks in clinical trials, which generates a list of tasks required to achieve lock criteria using clinical trial data and status, focusing the efforts of monitors and data managers on specific tasks, thereby streamlining the data cleaning and verification process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual tracking and management of data-related issues is used in the database locking process, then data integrity can be maintained through careful review, but the process becomes laborious and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoiddatabase locking time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical tracking processes with an automated computer-based system that electronically tracks and manages data-related issues throughout the database locking process, eliminating paper-based or manual follow-up methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a centralized tracking system that acts as an intermediary between various stakeholders (monitors, data managers, sites), automatically managing communications and task assignments without requiring direct manual coordination between all parties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive review of all data points is performed to ensure data integrity, then accuracy is improved, but the number of steps and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the comprehensive data review process into distinct manageable tasks and steps, allowing systematic progression through verification stages without overwhelming complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements automated feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors data quality metrics and provides real-time status updates, enabling dynamic adjustment of review priorities without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple stages of lock (soft lock, hard lock, interim lock) are implemented to ensure thorough verification, then data quality is improved, but the process duration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata qualityVSAvoidprocess duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic multi-stage locking system where the progression through soft lock, interim lock, and hard lock stages is automatically adjusted based on real-time data quality metrics and task completion status, allowing flexible optimization of verification thoroughness versus speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Loss of information

If manual tracking of each activity status is performed, then complete visibility of the process is achieved, but significant time is consumed in tracking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess visibilityVSAvoidtracking time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual tracking activities with automated electronic monitoring that continuously captures and updates the status of all data management activities, eliminating the need for manual status checking and follow-up

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous automated monitoring of all database locking activities, ensuring uninterrupted visibility into process status without requiring periodic manual checks that consume time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20100049545A1Automated identification of tasks that must be completed before a clinical trial database can be locked
Publication Date: 2010.02.25 NUMODA TECH
  • US20100049545A1 patent drawing
  • US20100049545A1 patent drawing
  • US20100049545A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Management of a database lock for a clinical trial study is provided. A database is provided that includes clinical trial data and the status of the data for a plurality of patients. Lock criteria is defined for the study from a plurality of selectable subsets of the clinical trial data. A processor automatically generates a list of tasks that must occur to achieve the lock defined by the lock criteria using the clinical trial data and the status of the data.