Multi-Shaft Clinostat Pseudo-Random Control for Microgravity Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional clinostats face challenges in maintaining constant microgravity levels for larger living beings and tend to stabilize, allowing samples to adapt and lose the microgravity effect, making it difficult to study the effects of microgravity on organisms of varying sizes and masses.

Innovation Solution

A mechatronic system with N degrees of freedom, featuring multiple independently controlled rotating shafts, generates a stable and constant level of microgravity, preventing adaptation by applying pseudo-random rotation speeds and directions, capable of housing living beings or objects up to 150 kg, including humans.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional clinostats with single or two rotating shafts are used, then microgravity can be generated for small samples, but the system stabilizes and allows samples to adapt, losing the microgravity effect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrogravity effect maintenanceVSAvoidexperiment duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing N (>2) independently controlled rotating shafts that continuously vary their rotation speeds and directions according to pseudo-random algorithms. This dynamic control prevents the system from stabilizing into predictable patterns, thereby maintaining the microgravity effect throughout extended experimental durations without sample adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic action through controlled rotation of multiple shafts at varying frequencies and amplitudes. Each shaft rotates periodically but with different parameters that change over time according to pseudo-random sequences, creating continuous microgravity conditions that prevent biological adaptation while maintaining reliable microgravity effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional clinostats are used, then microgravity can be generated, but it is difficult to study effects on organisms of varying sizes and masses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample size rangeVSAvoidmicrogravity level consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements parameter changes by allowing each of the N rotating shafts to operate with independently adjustable parameters including rotation speed, amplitude, and phase. The control system dynamically modifies these parameters based on pseudo-random algorithms, enabling the system to adapt to different sample sizes and masses while maintaining consistent microgravity levels through real-time parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the rotation control into N independent shafts, each capable of operating with different parameters. This segmentation allows the system to handle organisms of varying sizes and masses by assigning appropriate rotation characteristics to each shaft, thereby achieving both versatility in sample accommodation and reliability in microgravity generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If multiple independently controlled rotating shafts are used, then stable and constant microgravity can be generated preventing adaptation, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrogravity stabilityVSAvoidnumber of rotating shafts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing each of the N rotating shafts to perform multiple functions: generating centrifugal forces, creating Coriolis effects, and producing varied gravitational vectors. This multi-functionality allows the increased number of shafts to contribute to enhanced microgravity stability rather than merely increasing complexity, as each shaft serves multiple purposes in maintaining constant microgravity conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where sensors detect the actual microgravity conditions and feed this information back to the control system. The controller then adjusts the rotation parameters of the N shafts in real-time based on this feedback, ensuring stable and constant microgravity generation. This feedback loop justifies the increased device complexity by automatically optimizing the performance of multiple shafts to maintain reliable microgravity conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides a stable and continuous microgravity environment that prevents adaptation, allowing for extended experimentation and effective study of microgravity effects on larger organisms and objects, while maintaining a constant level of microgravity, even for high-mass samples.

Implementation Method 1

The rotation of said rotating bodies generates a level of simulated microgravity in said means to house a sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentEP3782915B1Apparatus and method for generating microgravity
Publication Date: 2023.09.06 INGESEA AUTOMATION SL
  • EP3782915B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3782915B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3782915B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

An apparatus (1) for generating microgravity comprising: a first rotating body (12) for rotating around a first shaft (12a), actuated by first actuation means (24), a means (60) for housing a sample circumscribed in the first rotating body (12), a second rotating body (11) for rotating around a second shaft (11a) actuated by second actuation means (23) and disposed in the interior of a volume delimited by the second rotating body (11), a third rotating body (10) for rotating around a third shaft (10a) actuated by third actuation means (21, 22) and disposed in the interior of a volume delimited by the third rotating body (10). The first, second and third actuation means are independent from each other, the rotation of each shaft being independent from the rotation of the other shafts. The rotation of said rotating bodies generates a level of simulated microgravity in the means for housing a sample. The apparatus comprises processing means for controlling the rotation of each shaft through the application, in each shaft, of a pseudo-random value of rotation speed during a pseudo-random time value, achieving an instability effect to prevent the sample housed in said means from adapting to the simulated microgravity generated by the apparatus (1).