CLIP Print Orientation Simulation for Surface Finish and Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional additive fabrication techniques for three-dimensional objects often face challenges in optimizing object orientation and fabrication parameters, leading to suboptimal results in terms of surface finish, mechanical strength, and production efficiency in Continuous Liquid Interface Printing (CLIP) systems.

Innovation Solution

The method involves determining the optimal orientation and fabrication parameters for CLIP systems by simulating different orientations and parameter sets based on user-defined objectives, such as surface finish and mechanical characteristics, to select the best configuration for fabricating three-dimensional objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional additive fabrication techniques are used with fixed orientation and parameter settings, then the fabrication process is simple and fast, but the surface finish and mechanical strength are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface finishVSAvoidfabrication process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation of different orientations and parameter sets before actual fabrication to determine the optimal configuration. This advance planning allows selection of parameters that maximize surface finish and mechanical strength without adding complexity to the fabrication process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates virtual copies of the object in different orientations and simulates fabrication for each copy. This allows evaluation of multiple configurations in silico before committing to physical fabrication, enabling optimization of surface finish and mechanical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Strength

If multiple orientations and parameter sets are evaluated through simulation, then manufacturing precision and mechanical strength are improved, but the fabrication time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidfabrication time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Simulation of multiple orientations and parameter sets is performed in advance before actual fabrication. This preliminary evaluation identifies the optimal configuration, ensuring maximum mechanical strength while avoiding time-consuming trial-and-error physical fabrication of suboptimal designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Virtual copies of the object are simulated in different orientations to evaluate mechanical strength characteristics. This computational approach allows rapid assessment of multiple configurations without the time penalty of physical prototyping and testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If optimal orientation is determined through simulation based on user-defined objectives, then production efficiency is improved, but the system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines optimal orientation and fabrication parameters by evaluating simulation results against user-defined objectives. This self-service capability eliminates the need for manual optimization and enables rapid selection of parameters that maximize production efficiency without requiring complex user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from simulation results to automatically adjust and select optimal fabrication parameters. By comparing simulated outcomes against defined objectives, the system iteratively identifies the best configuration, improving productivity through data-driven decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the selection of the most suitable orientation and parameter set that meets the desired objectives, resulting in improved surface finish, mechanical strength, and production efficiency in CLIP systems.

Implementation Method 1

layers may be formed through solidification of a photo curable resin responsive to visible or UV light irradiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS10953603B2Methods, systems, and computer program products for determining orientation and fabrication parameters used in three-dimensional (3D) continuous liquid interface printing (CLIP) systems, and related printers
Publication Date: 2021.03.23 CARBON INC
  • US10953603B2 patent drawing
  • US10953603B2 patent drawing
  • US10953603B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating a Continuous Liquid Interface Printing (CLIP) printer can include receiving a set of objectives for fabrication of an object using a CLIP printer and determining an orientation for fabrication of the object based on fulfillment of the set of objectives by simulated fabrication of the object.