Clock Fault Localization via Frequency Offset Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In mobile communications, determining a faulty clock in a wireless base station is challenging due to the difficulty in distinguishing between a faulty local clock and a faulty received clock, especially when frequency offsets exceed the ±4.6 ppm threshold.

Innovation Solution

A network device method that compares frequency offsets between at least two clocks and a local clock to determine if the local clock or a received clock is faulty, using conditions such as the quantity of clocks with frequency offsets exceeding a threshold to identify clock faults.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If frequency offset threshold comparison is used to detect clock faults, then clock fault detection capability is improved, but the ability to distinguish between local clock faults and received clock faults deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclock fault detection capabilityVSAvoidfault source identification difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the fault detection process into two distinct stages: first detecting whether a fault exists by comparing frequency offsets against a threshold, then identifying the fault source by comparing the local clock's frequency offset with received clocks' frequency offsets. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by separating detection capability from identification difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces frequency offset comparison as an intermediary mechanism. Instead of directly identifying fault sources, the system first uses frequency offset threshold comparison to detect faults, then uses frequency offset differential comparison to identify whether the local or received clocks are faulty. This intermediary approach improves detection while maintaining identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple frequency offset comparisons are performed to identify fault sources, then fault localization precision is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault localization precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic two-stage detection mechanism that adapts the comparison process based on initial detection results. The system first performs threshold-based detection, and only if a fault is detected does it proceed to the second stage of source identification through differential comparison. This dynamic approach improves precision while avoiding unnecessary complexity when no faults are present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary frequency offset threshold comparison before conducting more complex source identification comparisons. By first determining whether a fault exists, the system prepares the groundwork for precise localization only when necessary, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high precision when faults are detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12245180B2Method and network device for locating clock fault
Publication Date: 2025.03.04 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US12245180B2 patent drawing
  • US12245180B2 patent drawing
  • US12245180B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for locating a clock fault includes that a network device locates a clock fault source based on whether first frequency offsets between a plurality of input clocks and a local clock exceed a frequency offset threshold, or based on whether second frequency offsets between the input clocks exceed a relative frequency offset threshold.