Clock Synchronization in Cellular Networks via Grant-Free Transmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cellular mobile networks fail to meet the requirements of symmetrical delay and low jitter necessary for effective clock synchronization protocols, leading to unwanted coupling between radio procedures and application layers.

Innovation Solution

The method involves disabling Carrier-Aggregation, Coordinated MultiPoint, and Dual Connectivity for IP communication flows, setting target radio Block Error Rate to match packet loss rates, calculating radio packet size for single transmissions, bypassing radio scheduler queues, and utilizing grant-free transmission to ensure symmetrical delay and low jitter in uplink and downlink channels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If Carrier-Aggregation, Coordinated MultiPoint, and Dual Connectivity are used to improve spectral efficiency and cell coverage, then spectral efficiency and coverage are improved, but symmetrical delay and jitter performance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidsymmetrical delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments IP communication flows into two categories: clock synchronization flows and regular data flows. By applying different transmission modes to different flow types, the system can maintain spectral efficiency for regular data while ensuring symmetrical delay for synchronization packets. This is achieved by disabling CA, CoMP, and DC specifically for clock synchronization flows while maintaining them for other traffic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by implementing grant-free transmission specifically for uplink clock synchronization packets from UE to base station, while maintaining conventional scheduled transmission for other traffic. This localized application of grant-free transmission ensures low jitter for synchronization packets without affecting overall spectral efficiency of the network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of time

If grant-free transmission is used to reduce uplink delay, then uplink delay is reduced, but radio resource control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuplink delayVSAvoidradio resource control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the scheduling decision-making function from the base station for clock synchronization traffic and transfers it to the UE. The UE autonomously transmits synchronization packets without waiting for base station grants, eliminating scheduling delays. The base station simply monitors and processes these packets without complex scheduling operations, thus reducing both delay and control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent configures grant-free transmission parameters in advance for clock synchronization flows before actual transmission occurs. This preliminary configuration includes setting transmission power, resource allocation, and other parameters beforehand, allowing the UE to immediately transmit synchronization packets without real-time scheduling delays while maintaining simple base station processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3731575B1Method for clock synchronization of protocols, and network, base station and user equipments
Publication Date: 2021.11.03 DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
  • EP3731575B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3731575B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3731575B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A method for clock synchronization of protocols in a network comprising a base station, BS, the BS comprising a BS scheduler, a user equipment, UE, and a master clock as an Over-the-Top, OTT, IP service on uplink and downlink channels, the method comprising the steps of: a) enabling, by the network, one or more IP communication flows between interfaces of the master clock and the UE for IP time synchronization packets or packets with similar symmetrical delay and low jitter requirements; b) receiving at the UE and the BS packets of these IP communication flows; c) disabling, at the BS and the UE, the use of Carrier-Aggregation, CA, Coordinated MultiPoint, CoMP, and Dual Connectivity, DC, for data of these IP communication flows; d) setting, at the BS and the UE, the target radio Block Error Rate, BLER, of the uplink and downlink channels to a value equal to or less than that of the IP communication flow's target packet loss rate; e) calculating, at the BS and the UE, the radio packet size so as to ensure that each packet is transmitted over a single radio transmission; f) signaling, from the network to the BS scheduler, a signal indicating to bypass radio scheduler queues; g) receiving a signal at the BS scheduler to bypass radio scheduler queues; h) signaling, from the BS to the UE, a signal indicating to utilize grant-free transmission on the uplink channel; and i) receiving, at the UE, a signal indicating to utilize grant-free transmission on the uplink channel.