Cloned Mobile Device Detection via Fraud Score Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Network operators face challenges in detecting and preventing unauthorized usage of cloned devices, leading to incorrect deregistration of legitimate devices, unpaid network usage, and increased customer care costs, as cloned devices remain active and charge legitimate subscribers unfairly.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that utilize a processor to detect cloned mobile devices by calculating fraud scores based on device location, historical usage, and travel speed, allowing for automatic blocking and correction of billing records, and blacklisting of cloned devices to prevent re-registration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the network operator manually detects and removes cloned devices, then billing accuracy is improved, but response time increases and customer care costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebilling accuracyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic detection and blocking of cloned devices without requiring manual intervention from network operators or customer care agents. The automated fraud detection system monitors device registrations, compares locations and travel speeds, and automatically blocks suspected cloned devices, enabling the system to serve itself rather than requiring human operators to manually investigate and resolve fraud cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively detects and blocks cloned devices before they can cause significant harm. By continuously monitoring device registrations and comparing locations against historical data and travel speed thresholds, the system identifies fraudulent devices early in their operation and blocks them automatically, preventing widespread billing fraud rather than reacting after damages have occurred.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If the network operator manually investigates cloned device claims, then billing accuracy is improved, but operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebilling accuracyVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated fraud detection system handles the entire investigation process independently, eliminating the need for customer care agents to manually investigate cloned device claims. The system automatically compares device locations, calculates travel speeds, references historical usage patterns, and makes blocking decisions without human intervention, significantly reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors device registration data, location information, and usage patterns, automatically adjusting its detection algorithms based on feedback from actual fraud cases. This feedback loop enables the system to learn from past decisions and improve its accuracy over time, reducing the complexity of manual investigation requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the network operator provides service to cloned devices, then network coverage is maintained, but financial loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork coverageVSAvoidfinancial loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system blocks cloned devices at the point of registration by comparing their location against historical data and travel speed thresholds before allowing network access. This preliminary blocking action prevents financial loss from the outset while maintaining the ability to provide service to legitimate devices that travel between locations, as the system only blocks devices that exhibit fraudulent travel patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different treatment to different device registrations based on their specific characteristics. By analyzing the local context of each registration (location, travel speed, historical patterns), the system selectively blocks only those devices showing fraudulent behavior while allowing legitimate devices to access the network, thus maintaining network coverage quality while preventing financial loss from cloned devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10484873B2Detection and blocking of cloned mobile devices
Publication Date: 2019.11.19 AT&T MOBILITY II LLC
  • US10484873B2 patent drawing
  • US10484873B2 patent drawing
  • US10484873B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is disclosed for blocking a cloned mobile device by a processor of a network. The processor receives a first registration from a first mobile device at a first location. The first registration includes a device identifier and a phone number. The processor then confirms that a second registration from a second mobile device at a second location includes the device identifier and the phone number and calculates a first fraud score for the first mobile device and a second fraud score for the second mobile device. The processor then determines that the second mobile device is the cloned mobile device, when the second fraud score exceeds the first score, and blocks the cloned mobile device from registering on the network.