Closed-Course Scenario Replay for Rare AV Training Cases

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in handling infrequently encountered scenarios due to insufficient training data, which can lead to unsafe or abnormal responses.

Innovation Solution

A closed course environment is used to recreate important scenarios, allowing autonomous vehicles to interact with staged scenarios to gather additional training data, which is then used to adjust machine learning models, enhancing their ability to handle these rare situations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If autonomous vehicles are tested in real-world environments to improve machine learning models, then the models can learn from diverse scenarios, but infrequently encountered scenarios are insufficiently represented due to their rarity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle infrequently encountered scenariosVSAvoidtraining data quantity for rare scenarios
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of important but infrequently encountered scenarios from real-world testing data, then proactively recreates these scenarios in closed course environments before they are sufficiently represented in training data. This advance preparation ensures rare scenarios are adequately covered in model training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified copies or representations of complex real-world scenarios by staging them in controlled closed course environments. These staged scenarios capture the essential characteristics of rare events while allowing repeated testing and data collection without the constraints of real-world conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If more training data is collected from real-world scenarios, then model accuracy improves, but the time and resources required for data collection increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoiddata collection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of collecting additional real-world data over extended periods, the system creates staged copies of important scenarios in closed course environments. This allows rapid repetition of rare events that would otherwise require months or years of real-world driving to encounter sufficient times for adequate training data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous iterative cycles of: (1) identifying important scenarios from real-world testing, (2) staging them in closed courses, (3) collecting training data, and (4) updating models. This periodic process systematically improves model accuracy over time without requiring proportionally increasing real-world testing durations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If autonomous vehicles are tested extensively in real-world conditions to improve safety, then model reliability increases, but the risk of encountering unsafe or abnormal responses from insufficiently trained models increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of autonomous vehicle responsesVSAvoidunsafe responses from insufficient training
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification and staging of challenging scenarios in controlled closed course environments before deploying models to real-world autonomous operation. This advance testing in safe conditions allows the model to learn from edge cases without the risk of unsafe responses during actual autonomous driving.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a protective layer of staged training scenarios that cushion against potential unsafe responses by pre-exposing the model to challenging situations in controlled environments. This preparation reduces the likelihood of abnormal or unsafe responses when the model encounters similar scenarios during real-world autonomous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS12545293B2Continuous learning machine using closed course scenarios for autonomous vehicles
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 GM CRUISE HOLDINGS LLC
  • US12545293B2 patent drawing
  • US12545293B2 patent drawing
  • US12545293B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present technology pertains to obtaining sensor data and processed sensor data related to a base world scenario encountered by an AV entity. The sensor data and processed sensor data may be assessed to determine an importance value for the base world scenario. When the importance value is above a threshold, a closed course staging system may stage a re-creation of the base world scenario in a closed course environment (i.e., a closed course scenario). An AV may then interact with the closed course scenario. Sensor data and processed sensor data from the AV's interaction with the closed course scenario may then be added to training data used to train ML models for AVs.