Artificial Iris With Closed Supports for Small-Incision Implantation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing artificial irises lack sufficient rigidity in their support elements, leading to post-operative displacement and difficulty in implantation through small incisions, as seen in prior art solutions like RU 2526245.

Innovation Solution

The artificial iris is designed with closed peripheral support elements made of a more resilient material than the colored ring, featuring a thickness exceeding 0.6 mm, and optionally includes a flange, ensuring secure retention and ease of implantation through small incisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the thickness of support elements is increased to improve rigidity, then the rigidity and retention security are improved, but the ease of implantation through small incision is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverigidity of support elementsVSAvoidease of implantation through small incision
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the thickness parameter of support elements to exceed the thickness of the colored ring, and selecting appropriate material resilience parameters. This creates an optimal balance where support elements have sufficient rigidity for secure retention while remaining thin enough to pass through small incisions during implantation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite material structure by combining support elements made of more resilient material than the colored ring. This material differentiation allows support elements to exhibit higher rigidity when needed for retention while the overall implant structure remains flexible enough for minimally invasive implantation through small incisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If the material resilience of support elements is increased to improve retention, then the retention security is improved, but the flexibility for implantation is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretention security of artificial irisVSAvoidflexibility for implantation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making different parts of the artificial iris with different material properties. Specifically, support elements are made of more resilient material compared to the colored ring, creating localized high-resilience zones that provide secure retention while other parts maintain appropriate flexibility for implantation and adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes material resilience parameters selectively in different components. The support elements use material with higher resilience to ensure reliable retention, while the overall thickness and geometry parameters are optimized to maintain sufficient flexibility for surgical implantation procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If the thickness of support elements is increased to prevent displacement, then the retention stability is improved, but the risk of surgical injury is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretention stability of artificial irisVSAvoidrisk of surgical injury
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the thickness parameter of support elements to exceed the thickness of the colored ring but remains within safe limits for surgical implantation. This parameter optimization ensures that support elements provide sufficient stability to prevent post-operative displacement while maintaining thin enough dimensions to minimize surgical injury risk during insertion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides secure retention and self-centering of the artificial iris in the ciliary sulcus, reducing the risk of post-operative displacement and facilitating implantation without causing surgical injury.

Implementation Method 1

Material resilience of support elements may exceed material resilience of the colored ring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMaterial resilience: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3446658B1Artificial iris
Publication Date: 2025.10.01 LLC ENTERPRISE REPER NN
  • EP3446658B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3446658B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The invention relates to the field of medicine, more particularly to ophthalmology, and is intended for reconstructive surgery for pathology of the iris or combined pathology of the iris and lens. The technical result is aimed at providing support elements which have the necessary rigidity and can be firmly fixed, while preserving the ease of implantation of an artificial iris. The technical result is achieved in that the proposed artificial iris is made of an elastic material in the form of a colored ring comprising peripheral support elements capable of bending in the plane of the colored ring, wherein the support elements are closed and the thickness thereof exceeds the thickness of the colored ring.