Closed Loop Control System for Spinal Cord Epidural Stimulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) technologies lack closed-loop control for neuromodulation, limiting their therapeutic effectiveness in managing cardiovascular and bladder functions in individuals with motor complete spinal cord injury (SCI) due to the absence of real-time, complex multi-system stimulation patterns, which is crucial for regulating dynamic interplay between these systems.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop control system integrating a neurostimulator, a first controller, a second controller, and sensors to apply and adjust spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) based on real-time physiological data, using predictive learning algorithms to optimize stimulation configurations for cardiovascular and bladder control, enabling seamless interaction and monitoring across multiple physiological systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If spinal cord epidural stimulation is applied to improve cardiovascular and bladder function in individuals with SCI, then therapeutic benefits are achieved, but the lack of closed-loop control limits its effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic effectivenessVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements closed-loop control by continuously monitoring physiological parameters (blood pressure, bladder pressure, EMG signals) and using this feedback to automatically adjust stimulation parameters. The system compares actual physiological responses with target values and dynamically modifies stimulation amplitude, pulse width, and frequency to optimize therapeutic outcomes while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs automatic parameter adjustment and stimulation delivery without requiring continuous manual intervention. The system self-regulates by processing sensor data, generating control decisions through algorithms, and executing stimulation parameter changes autonomously, reducing the burden on users and clinicians while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If complex multi-system stimulation patterns are applied in real-time to regulate dynamic interplay between cardiovascular and bladder systems, then functional regulation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-system regulation capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the control system into modular functional components: sensor modules for detecting physiological parameters, processing modules for analyzing data and generating control decisions, and execution modules for delivering stimulation. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in specific tasks, improving adaptability while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is designed to simultaneously regulate multiple physiological systems (cardiovascular, bladder, respiratory) using a unified platform. The system can generate complex multi-system stimulation patterns by coordinating different electrode configurations and stimulation parameters across multiple targets, enabling versatile functional regulation without requiring separate dedicated devices for each system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If the burden on the user to adjust and monitor stimulation and physiological parameters is reduced, then ease of operation improves, but automation requirements increase device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser operation simplicityVSAvoidautomatic parameter adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors physiological parameters, processes sensor data, generates control decisions, and adjusts stimulation parameters without requiring manual user intervention. The automated control loop continuously adapts stimulation based on real-time physiological feedback, significantly reducing the operational burden on users while improving ease of use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates continuous feedback from multiple sensors monitoring physiological parameters, which is automatically processed to adjust stimulation parameters. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to self-correct and optimize performance automatically, reducing the need for manual monitoring and adjustment by users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20220193415A1Closed loop control system
Publication Date: 2022.06.23 UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • US20220193415A1 patent drawing
  • US20220193415A1 patent drawing
  • US20220193415A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A closed loop system for control of spinal cord epidural stimulation includes a second controller hosting software for receiving, from at least one sensor, physiological data from a subject, generating a stimulation configuration based on the data, and transmitting the configuration to a first controller which operatively causes a neurostimulator to apply the stimulation configuration to the subject, the physiological results of such stimulation are monitored by the at least one sensor.