Closed-Loop Conveyor Meal Preparation for High-Volume Fresh Cooking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current meal preparation technologies face challenges in balancing high-volume, cost-effective production of freshly cooked meals that are both healthy and affordable, as existing automated systems have low throughput and require harmful additives to extend shelf life, while manual preparation methods are labor-intensive and expensive.

Innovation Solution

An automated meal preparation apparatus featuring a closed-loop conveyor rail with multiple cooking pots that move through sequential stations for ingredient dispensing, heating, serving, and cleaning, allowing for concurrent processing of multiple meals and reducing labor and maintenance costs, while maintaining food safety and quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If meals are cooked individually in small cooking pots as in fast casual restaurants, then food quality and taste are improved due to the Maillard reaction, but labor intensity increases and production volume decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood qualityVSAvoidproduction volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooking process is segmented into multiple independent stations (ingredient dispensing, preparation, cooking, serving) along a conveyor system. Each station performs a specific function, allowing simultaneous processing of multiple meals while maintaining individual cooking quality. The cooking pots are divided into separate units that can be independently processed through the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The conveyor-based system enables continuous processing of meals through multiple stations without interruption. While one pot is being cooked, another is being prepared, and a third is being served, maximizing productivity while maintaining the quality benefits of individual cooking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Productivity

If meals are cooked in large batches in industrial cooking equipment, then production volume increases and labor requirements decrease, but food quality deteriorates due to lack of Maillard reaction and harmful additives are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction volumeVSAvoidfood quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the large-scale cooking process into individual pot-sized portions that move through separate stations. This allows industrial-volume production while each meal cooks individually in its own pot, preserving the Maillard reaction and eliminating the need for harmful additives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The conveyor system acts as an intermediary that enables individual pots to move through the production line one by one, maintaining the quality benefits of small-batch cooking while achieving the throughput of large-scale industrial production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Extent of automation

If automated meal preparation devices are implemented, then labor costs decrease, but device complexity increases and investment costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabor reductionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system is divided into separate functional stations (ingredient dispensing, preparation, cooking, serving) that can be independently operated and maintained. This modular approach reduces overall system complexity while achieving high automation levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cooking pots and conveyor system serve multiple functions throughout the process - holding ingredients, transporting meals, cooking, and serving. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized equipment, simplifying the overall system while maintaining automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Loss of time

If harmful additives are used to extend shelf life in prepacked meals, then production time is reduced and distribution flexibility increases, but healthfulness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction timeVSAvoidhealthfulness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Meals are prepared and cooked in advance on the same day they are served, with the cooking process completed before serving. This preliminary preparation eliminates the need for preservatives while maintaining freshness, as the meals are cooked-to-order rather than pre-cooked days in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus enables high-throughput production of unique, freshly cooked meals without additives, reducing costs and maintaining food safety standards, thus providing an economically viable solution for both high-volume and fresh meal production.

Implementation Method 1

a preparation station, located downstream from the ingredient dispensing station in the conveying direction, and comprising a heating element configured to heat the ingredients in a cooking pot of the plurality of cooking pots conveyed to the preparation station

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

At least part of the ingredients in the cooking pot are heated at the preparation station. The heated ingredients are then dispensed from the cooking pot at the serving station. [...] at least partially due to the Maillard reaction, which may also be referred to as the browning reaction. This reaction occurs when heating ingredients at low moisture content.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMaillard reaction:

Data Source

PatentUS20230061171A1Automated meal preparation apparatus
Publication Date: 2023.03.02 EATCH BV
  • US20230061171A1 patent drawing
  • US20230061171A1 patent drawing
  • US20230061171A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Automated meal preparation apparatus for continuous preparation of meals, comprising a closed-loop conveyor rail configured to support a plurality of cooking pots, driving means configured to simultaneously convey the cooking pots in a conveying direction along the closed-loop conveyor rail to a plurality of separate stations sequentially located along the closed-loop conveyor rail and being stationary with respect thereto, the plurality of stations comprising an ingredient dispensing station comprising an ingredient dispenser configured to dispense ingredients in a cooking pot, a preparation station, located downstream from the ingredient dispensing station in the conveying direction, and comprising a heating element, a serving station, located downstream from the preparation station, and comprising a dispensing mechanism, and a cleaning station, located downstream from the serving station and upstream from the ingredient dispensing station in the conveying direction, and comprising a cleaning unit configured to clean a cooking pot.