Closed-Loop Cryogen Cooling for Computing Hardware Temperature Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cryogenic cooling systems for processing circuitry are open-loop, leading to constant replenishment needs, condensation issues, lack of temperature control, and scalability limitations, which can damage components and hinder performance.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop cryogenic cooling system with a cryogen distribution system that recaptures and processes evaporated cryogen, uses a heating element for precise temperature control, and is scalable, incorporating a cryogen evaporator plate and distribution system within a sealed housing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If conventional cooling methods (underfloor trays, overhead plenums) are used, then cooling capability is limited, but device complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capabilityVSAvoidcooling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the cooling function with the existing rack structure by integrating cooling fins directly into the rack framework. This merging eliminates the need for separate cooling systems while providing effective thermal management through the rack's own structural elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rack structure serves dual purposes: supporting computing equipment and providing cooling functionality through integrated fins. This multi-functionality allows the same structure to perform both mechanical support and thermal management, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Temperature

If more cooling infrastructure is added, then cooling effectiveness improves, but installation space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling effectivenessVSAvoidinstallation space
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from horizontal cooling approaches (underfloor trays, overhead plenums) to vertical cooling by extending fins upward from the rack base. This dimensional change allows cooling functionality to be achieved within the vertical space already occupied by the rack, without requiring additional horizontal installation area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling fins are nested within the rack structure itself, using the rack's vertical space and framework. This nesting approach allows the cooling system to be contained within the existing rack footprint, maximizing cooling effectiveness without increasing overall space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Temperature

If cooling fins are added to racks, then cooling effectiveness improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling effectivenessVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies optimal fin parameters (spacing of 0.5-2 inches, height of 6-18 inches) that balance cooling effectiveness with manufacturability. These parameter ranges are chosen to achieve good thermal performance while remaining practical for standard manufacturing processes and materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling fins are concentrated at the base of the rack where heat generation is highest, providing localized cooling where it is most needed. This local quality approach focuses manufacturing effort on the most critical thermal management area rather than requiring complex cooling throughout the entire rack structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides reliable, long-term cooling with precise temperature control, preventing component damage and enabling scalability, with a coefficient of performance (CoP) greater than or equal to five.

Implementation Method 1

a first set of cooling fins of the first rack extending from a base of the first rack in a downward direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 2

a first set of cooling fins of the first rack extending from a base of the first rack in a downward direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal Radiation: Thermal Radiation

Data Source

PatentEP4091033B1Systems and methods for cooling a computing system
Publication Date: 2026.04.29 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • EP4091033B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4091033B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4091033B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A computing system includes a housing, processing circuitry, one or more additional components, and a cryogen evaporator plate. The housing includes a cryogen input port, a cryogen output port, and an interior chamber. The processing circuitry and the one or more additional components are in the interior chamber of the housing. The cryogen evaporator plate is thermally coupled to the processing circuitry and configured to receive a cryogen via the cryogen input port, cool the processing circuitry using the cryogen such that the cryogen is evaporated during the cooling of the processing circuitry to provide evaporated cryogen, and provide the evaporated cryogen into the interior chamber of the housing such that the evaporated cryogen is distributed over the one or more additional components to cool the one or more additional components.