Closed-Loop Dehydration for Mercury Removal Regeneration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mercury removal units in cryogenic gas plants face significant costs and environmental impacts due to the practice of flaring spent, wet gas instead of recovering and recycling it for dehydration, leading to unnecessary nitrogen or process gas loss.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop system is implemented for dehydrating mercury removal units, where spent, wet gas is recycled and compressed, then reused to regenerate the mercury adsorbent material, bypassing flaring by directing the regeneration gas stream to upstream units within the plant, allowing for continuous operation and minimizing gas loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If spent wet gas is sent to flare, then environmental compliance is simplified, but significant costs are incurred due to unrecovered nitrogen or process gas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenitrogen or process gas lossVSAvoiddehydration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent recovers spent wet gas from the mercury removal unit that would otherwise be discarded to flare. The system captures this gas, dehydrates it through molecular sieve vessels, and recompresses it for reuse as regeneration gas, thereby recovering valuable nitrogen or process gas and eliminating flaring costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The dehydration system is self-sufficient, using the spent wet gas from the mercury removal unit itself as the feedstock for its own molecular sieve dehydration vessels. This creates a closed-loop system where the unit dehydrates its own spent gas without requiring external dry gas sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Quantity of substance

If spent wet gas is flared, then environmental penalties are avoided, but substantial cost savings are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregeneration gas quantityVSAvoidenvironmental impact of flaring
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system prevents the harmful act of flaring by recovering and reusing the spent wet gas. Instead of burning it in a flare, the gas is dehydrated and recompressed for continued use as regeneration gas, eliminating environmental penalties while maintaining adequate regeneration gas quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the spent wet gas from an unwanted waste stream into a useful regeneration gas by changing its moisture content parameter through molecular sieve dehydration. This parameter change enables the gas to be reused without compromising the performance of the mercury removal unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If hot dry gas is used for dehydration, then mercury adsorbent material is effectively regenerated, but unrecovered gas incurs significant costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercury removal effectivenessVSAvoidunrecovered nitrogen or process gas
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses its own spent wet gas as the feedstock for dehydration, making the regeneration process self-sufficient. The molecular sieve vessels dehydrate the spent gas from the mercury removal unit, and the regenerated gas is reused for continued dehydration operations, eliminating the need for external dry gas sources and preventing gas loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of discarding the spent wet gas to flare, the system recovers it and processes it through molecular sieve dehydration. This recovery process maintains the reliability of mercury removal by ensuring adequate dehydration capability while preventing the loss of valuable nitrogen or process gas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in substantial cost savings and reduced environmental impact by preventing gas flaring, enabling efficient reuse of nitrogen or process gas and ensuring effective dehydration of mercury removal beds without the need for additional gas sourcing.

Implementation Method 1

A condenser is in communication with the wet gas outlet of the mercury removal vessel in dehydration mode for condensing water to form a stream containing water and regeneration gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 2

A separator is provided for separating the water and the regeneration gas from the stream containing water and gas thereby forming a water stream and a regeneration gas stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation:

Implementation Method 3

A compressor is provided for compressing the regeneration gas stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 4

a pair of dehydration vessels containing molecular sieve material receives gas from a line downstream of the compressor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 5

a mercury removal vessel containing mercury adsorbing material for adsorbing mercury from a feed gas stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS10537844B2System for closed loop dehydration of a mercury removal unit
Publication Date: 2020.01.21 CHEVRON USA INC
  • US10537844B2 patent drawing
  • US10537844B2 patent drawing
  • US10537844B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a system in which saturated mercury adsorbent in a gas mercury removal unit is dehydrated in a LNG, LPG or cryogenic gas plant using a regeneration gas stream. Spent regeneration gas stream is then condensed and the water is removed therefrom to form a renewed regeneration gas stream in a closed loop. The regeneration gas stream is compressed and recycled to a location in the plant upstream of an acid gas removal unit or upstream of a regeneration gas dehydration unit such that the regeneration gas stream is not sent to a flare. A dehydration unit having a pair of dehydration vessels, arranged in parallel, alternating between absorption and regeneration modes, receives gas from the compressor. Conventional plants can be retrofitted to achieve improved process efficiencies, cost savings and environmental benefits.