Closed-Loop Driver Attention Management via Staged Visual Prompts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous driving systems face challenges in maintaining driver attentiveness and supervisory control, as existing systems often distract drivers or rely on external triggers, failing to ensure continuous minimum driver attention without causing distractions.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop driver visual attention management system that uses sensors to detect driver characteristics and provide tailored prompts, including light cues and audio messages, to maintain driver engagement and control, with a staged alerting system to increase intrusiveness if necessary, ensuring the driver's supervisory role is maintained.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If driver monitoring systems and displays are used to inform drivers of their attentiveness, then driver attention is improved, but driver distraction increases and attentiveness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver attentionVSAvoiddriver distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic micro-prompting with brief, subtle visual or haptic cues rather than continuous monitoring displays. These periodic prompts gently nudge driver attention without creating sustained distraction, resolving the contradiction between maintaining attention and avoiding distraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary alert mechanism that mediates between the driver's attention state and the autonomous system's control. This intermediary provides subtle cues through peripheral vision or haptic feedback, informing drivers of their attentiveness without requiring direct visual engagement with distracting displays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If external event triggers are used to alert distracted drivers, then driver attention is improved, but the system cannot operate constantly to maintain minimum driver attention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver attentionVSAvoidsystem operation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors driver attention states through sensors detecting eye position, head orientation, and vehicle control interactions. This continuous operation maintains minimum driver attention levels without relying on external triggers, enabling the system to adapt to varying driving conditions and driver states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements closed-loop feedback by continuously monitoring driver attention and adjusting prompt frequency and intensity accordingly. When attention drops below thresholds, the system increases prompting; when attention is adequate, prompting decreases, maintaining adaptability while operating constantly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If automated driving controls are used to reduce driver interaction, then driver fatigue is reduced and safety is improved, but driver supervisory control may be lost

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddriver supervisory control awareness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously assessing driver attention and preparing appropriate prompts before critical situations arise. This ensures the driver maintains supervisory control awareness through proactive, subtle cues rather than reactive alerts only when problems occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The driver serves themselves by maintaining supervisory control through the system's subtle prompts that encourage natural attention checks. The system provides the framework for self-monitoring and self-correction, allowing drivers to maintain awareness without external coercion or intrusive interventions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9235987B2System and method for closed-loop driver attention management
Publication Date: 2016.01.12 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US9235987B2 patent drawing
  • US9235987B2 patent drawing
  • US9235987B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system may manage the driver's attention while driving. The driver may be driving using an autonomous driving system or limited-ability autonomous driving system. A method may detect, by a sensor, characteristics of a driver; determine, based on the detected characteristics of the driver, whether the driver exercises sufficient supervisory control of the vehicle; and provide a series of one or more prompts, wherein each prompt's intrusiveness is related to the determination of whether the driver exercises sufficient supervisory control of the vehicle.