Closed-Loop Engine Combustion Control With Adaptive Injector Maps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing closed-loop combustion control systems struggle to achieve balanced combustion across multiple cylinders due to variations in engine configuration, fuel injector differences, and aging, leading to performance deterioration.

Innovation Solution

A three-level closed-loop combustion control strategy using a base compensation map, adaptive map, and feedback controller to compensate for engine configuration and injector differences, with an adaptive map that learns and adjusts to injector aging over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a simple feedback controller is used for closed-loop combustion control, then the control system is simple, but it cannot achieve balanced combustion across multiple cylinders due to variations in engine configuration and injector differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidcombustion balance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the combustion control into three separate levels: base compensation (addressing engine configuration variations), injector-specific compensation (addressing injector differences), and feedback control (real-time adjustment). This segmentation allows each level to address specific sources of combustion variability independently, achieving balanced combustion across all cylinders while maintaining systematic simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary compensation through base compensation maps and injector-specific compensation maps before the feedback controller operates. These pre-calculated compensation values account for known variations in engine configuration and injector characteristics, allowing the simple feedback controller to focus only on real-time adjustments rather than trying to compensate for all variations simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If injector variations and aging are not compensated, then the control system remains simple, but combustion balance deteriorates over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidcombustion consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-calculates and stores compensation values for different injector conditions and aging states in compensation maps. During operation, the system selects appropriate compensation values based on injector age or condition without requiring real-time complex analysis, thus maintaining simple control logic while accounting for injector variations and aging effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces compensation parameters that adjust injection timing and duration based on injector-specific characteristics and aging. By changing these control parameters according to pre-determined compensation values, the system maintains combustion consistency across different injector conditions without increasing the fundamental control system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If individual cylinder control is implemented, then combustion balance is improved, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion balanceVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control system into three distinct functional layers: base compensation (common to all cylinders), injector-specific compensation (specific to each injector), and feedback control (cylinder-specific real-time adjustment). This segmentation allows individual cylinder control to be achieved while reusing common compensation data across multiple cylinders, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base compensation map serves all cylinders simultaneously, providing universal compensation for engine configuration variations. The injector-specific compensation maps are reused across multiple operating conditions, and the feedback controller uses a standardized algorithm for each cylinder. This multi-functionality reduces the total complexity compared to implementing completely independent control for each cylinder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250320840A1Device for applying a closed loop combustion control to an engine and method therefor
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 LIEBHERR COMPONENTS COLMAR SAS
  • US20250320840A1 patent drawing
  • US20250320840A1 patent drawing
  • US20250320840A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a device for applying a closed-loop combustion control for an engine having plural cylinders, comprising: a plurality of fuel injectors for supplying fuel into each one of the plurality of cylinders of the engine, a plurality of pressure sensors, wherein in or at each of the plurality of cylinders one of the plurality of pressure sensors is arranged for determining the pressure therein, and an electronic control unit for receiving the sensor values obtained by the plurality of pressure sensors and for controlling injection parameters of the plurality of fuel injectors, optionally for controlling fuel quantity and/or injection timing, wherein the electronic control unit is configured to individually perform a closed-loop combustion control strategy for each of the cylinders of the engine.