Closed-Loop Erosion Control Structure for Soil and Vegetation Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing erosion control structures are difficult and expensive to manufacture and deploy, and often fail to effectively retain soil and vegetation, particularly at shorelines and inclines, leading to erosion, pollution, and increased maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

A closed loop or partially closed loop structure made of tied blocks, combined with a flexible grid material and a core, which is easy to assemble and anchor to the substrate, allowing for soil and vegetation buildup behind the structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing erosion control structures are used at shorelines and inclines, then erosion control function is provided, but manufacturing and deployment cost and difficulty increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerosion control effectivenessVSAvoidmanufacturing and deployment difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The erosion control structure is divided into multiple modular panels that can be individually manufactured, transported, and assembled. Each panel contains integrated tie-back blocks and drainage features, allowing standardized production while enabling flexible deployment configurations to match various shoreline and slope geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple functional elements are combined into a single integrated panel structure: the retaining wall face, tie-back blocks for anchoring, drainage channels for water management, and vegetation integration features all merge into one unified component that performs erosion control, stabilization, and drainage simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If existing erosion control structures are positioned at toe of slope, then soil retention is achieved, but installation complexity and expense increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoil retention capabilityVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The tie-back blocks and anchoring features are pre-integrated into the panel structure during manufacturing, eliminating the need for complex field anchoring operations. Panels are designed to be installed in a sequential, gravity-assisted manner that reduces installation complexity while maintaining secure soil retention at the toe of slope.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The panel structure incorporates self-aligning and self-stabilizing features that reduce the need for complex installation equipment and procedures. The integrated drainage and weighting features allow panels to self-adjust and stabilize during installation, simplifying the deployment process while ensuring effective soil retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If conventional erosion control structures are used, then some erosion protection is provided, but they fail to provide sufficient soil buildup and vegetation support

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerosion protectionVSAvoidsoil buildup capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The panel structure incorporates varying geometries and features at different locations: the front face provides erosion protection while the rear integration zone with tie-back blocks and drainage channels creates optimal conditions for soil accumulation and vegetation establishment. This localized functional differentiation enables both protection and productive soil buildup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The structure combines engineered concrete or polymer materials with natural soil and vegetation elements to create a composite system. The rigid panel provides structural protection while the integrated soil retention zones support biological growth, combining mechanical and biological approaches to achieve superior erosion control and soil buildup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS20250257543A1Erosion control structure
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 MOTZ ENTERPRISES INC
  • US20250257543A1 patent drawing
  • US20250257543A1 patent drawing
  • US20250257543A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system including a closed loop or partially closed loop structure, including tied blocks, positioned at or adjacent to a toe of a slope.