Closed-Loop Griddle Heat Control With Real-Time Cooking Guidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional gas cooktops with griddles lack guidance on optimal usage, leading to user errors such as incorrect food positioning, timing, and volume, which can result in suboptimal cooking performance.

Innovation Solution

A method for operating a gas cooktop with a griddle that includes a graphical user interface to prompt users for food type and quantity, provide visual instructions for optimal food positioning, and automatically control griddle heat based on the selected task.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If automatic temperature control is implemented, then cooking temperature stability is improved, but user guidance and instruction capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking temperature stabilityVSAvoiduser guidance capability
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback loop where the graphical user interface continuously monitors cooking progress and provides real-time guidance to users. The controller receives temperature data from sensors and sends instructional feedback to the display, creating a closed-loop system that maintains both temperature stability and user guidance capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The graphical user interface acts as an intermediary between the automatic temperature control system and the user. It translates complex temperature control operations into simple, actionable instructions, allowing the system to maintain precise temperature control while keeping the user informed and guided throughout the cooking process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If manual operation is maintained, then user control flexibility is improved, but cooking precision and consistency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser control flexibilityVSAvoidcooking precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service operation where the cooking appliance automatically monitors its own temperature and adjusts heating elements to maintain optimal cooking conditions. The graphical user interface provides step-by-step guidance that allows users to simply follow instructions while the system handles the precise temperature control, combining automatic precision with user-friendly operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Real-time temperature feedback from sensors is continuously compared against target temperatures, and the system automatically adjusts heating power to maintain cooking precision. The graphical user interface provides feedback to users about current cooking status, allowing them to make minor adjustments while the system maintains overall precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If comprehensive guidance instructions are provided, then user error reduction is improved, but system complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser error reductionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides preliminary guidance instructions before cooking begins, including food preparation tips, recommended temperatures, and step-by-step procedures. The graphical user interface displays all necessary information in advance, allowing users to understand the complete cooking process before starting, thereby reducing errors without requiring complex real-time intervention systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that monitor cooking progress and provide corrective guidance only when deviations occur. The graphical user interface compares actual cooking status against expected parameters and provides targeted instructions to correct potential errors, reducing overall system complexity by providing guidance only when needed rather than continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances user experience by providing tailored cooking instructions and heat control, optimizing cooking performance and reducing user errors.

Implementation Method 1

one or more heating elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

temperature sensing assembly operably coupled to the griddle for monitoring a cooking temperature of the griddle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS20250093043A1Closed loop griddle operation for a cooktop appliance
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS INC
  • US20250093043A1 patent drawing
  • US20250093043A1 patent drawing
  • US20250093043A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating a cooktop includes receiving a request to perform a griddle cooking operation on a griddle, receiving a food type or a food quantity of food being cooked during the griddle cooking operation, providing user instruction on a graphical user interface based at least in part on the food type or the food quantity, the user instruction including at least one of a food positioning recommendation, a food flip interval, an optimum volume or mass of food, an elapsed cooking time, or a remaining cooking time, and operating a one or more heating elements to perform the griddle cooking operation.