Closed-Loop Microfluidic Cell Enrichment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for cell separation in biofluids face challenges in achieving high purity and recovery of rare cells, often compromising between these two factors, and require processing large volumes with minimal molecular background interference.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop inertial microfluidic system with a spiral microchannel having a trapezoidal cross-section, allowing for recirculation of sample fluid and separation based on particle size and deformability, enabling efficient isolation and enrichment of rare cells by bifurcating streams and recirculating them for concentration and purification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If inertial microfluidics is used for cell separation, then processing rate is improved, but purity and recovery of rare cells deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing rateVSAvoidpurity and recovery
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a closed-loop recirculation system where the fluid continuously flows through the microchannel, allowing multiple separation passes without interrupting the process. This continuous action enables both high processing rates and improved purity/recovery by repeatedly exposing particles to the separation mechanism, accumulating rare cells over multiple cycles while maintaining steady-state flow conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates a feedback loop where separated particles are recirculated back through the microchannel. This feedback mechanism allows the system to continuously refine the separation process, with each pass improving the purity and recovery of rare cells while maintaining high processing throughput through automated continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Quantity of substance

If large volumes of biofluid are processed, then quantity of target cells is improved, but background interference worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of target cellsVSAvoidbackground interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a microchannel with specifically designed geometry (non-rectangular cross-section with curved walls) that extracts or removes background molecules and non-target particles from the fluid stream through inertial focusing and Dean flow effects. This selective extraction allows processing of large volumes to recover sufficient target cells while actively removing background interference that would otherwise contaminate the sample.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The microchannel geometry creates localized flow patterns and inertial forces that selectively affect different particle sizes and densities. By optimizing the channel dimensions and curvature, the system creates local conditions that enhance separation of rare cells from background, allowing high-throughput processing with minimal contamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If single-pass separation is used, then device complexity is reduced, but separation efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidseparation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the separation and concentration functions into a single integrated microfluidic device with a closed-loop configuration. By combining multiple separation passes within one continuous flow path and using the recirculation loop to concentrate particles, the system achieves high separation efficiency without requiring multiple separate devices or complex multi-stage processing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves high recovery and purity of target cells, minimizing background interference and allowing for continuous processing of large volumes, suitable for downstream assays like ELISA and PCR, with over 95% cell recovery and 97.7% viability.

Implementation Method 1

the field of inertial microfluidics has shown promise for in separating cells from a biofluid with high processing rates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial microfluidics: Inertia

Implementation Method 2

one being the net lift force and the other being the Dean drag force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNet lift force: Force

Implementation Method 3

one being the net lift force and the other being the Dean drag force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDean drag force: Drag

Data Source

PatentEP3523003B1Particle isolation/enrichment using continuous closed-loop micro-fluidics
Publication Date: 2023.09.13 MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH
  • EP3523003B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3523003B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3523003B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention encompasses a micro-fluidic system having a closed-loop configuration in which inertial micro-fluidic separation of particles and/or cells is continuously repeated by feeding part of the output back to the input so that the purity and/or concentration of the particles and/or cell is maximized. The invention also includes methods of using the micro-fluidic system.