Closed-Loop Neural Stimulation with Out-of-Compliance Current Limit Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Neural stimulation devices face challenges in maintaining optimal stimulus intensity due to electrode migration and postural changes, leading to ineffective or painful therapy, and out-of-compliance events that limit the range of test stimuli during programming and therapy.

Innovation Solution

The method estimates the out-of-compliance current limit for each stimulus electrode configuration using measured electrode resistances and adjusts stimulus parameters to prevent out-of-compliance events by increasing the current limit or reducing the maximum stimulus current, ensuring effective neural stimulation therapy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If stimulus intensity is increased to maintain therapeutic effect, then neural recruitment is improved, but discomfort threshold is exceeded causing painful percepts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic effectVSAvoidpainful percepts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a feedback controller that continuously monitors the neural response and adjusts stimulus intensity to maintain the response within a therapeutic range. The feedback controller receives the measured intensity of the evoked neural response and adjusts the stimulus intensity parameter accordingly, preventing both sub-therapeutic and supra-therapeutic stimulation that would cause discomfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Stability of the object's composition

If electrode array position is fixed to maintain stable neural recruitment, then therapeutic range is preserved, but electrode migration and postural changes cannot be accommodated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode positionVSAvoidresponse to migration and posture change
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback controller continuously monitors the intensity of the evoked neural response and adjusts stimulus intensity in real-time to compensate for changes in electrode-to-fibre distance caused by electrode migration or postural changes. This maintains stable neural recruitment despite physical displacement of the electrode array.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the stimulus intensity parameter based on real-time measurements of neural response intensity. Rather than using a fixed stimulus intensity, the system adapts the stimulation parameters continuously to maintain optimal therapeutic effect despite changing physiological conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If stimulus intensity is maintained above recruitment threshold to ensure therapeutic effect, then neural activation is sufficient, but out-of-compliance events occur limiting test stimulus range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural activationVSAvoidout-of-compliance events
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary estimation of the out-of-compliance current limit for each stimulus electrode configuration using measured electrode resistances. By knowing this limit in advance, the feedback controller can adjust stimulus parameters to stay within compliant operation while maintaining effective neural activation, preventing out-of-compliance events before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for pre-emptive mitigation of out-of-compliance events, maintaining therapeutic stimulus intensity and reducing the risk of ineffective or painful therapy, thereby improving the efficiency and comfort of neural stimulation.

Implementation Method 1

An electrical pulse of sufficient intensity applied to the target neural fibres by a stimulus electrode causes the depolarisation of neurons in the fibres, which in turn generates an action potential in the fibres

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical stimulation: Electric Field

Implementation Method 2

A signal representative of the neural response may be sensed by a measurement electrode in electrical communication with the recruited neural fibres

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical signal detection: Electric Field

Implementation Method 3

Feedback control seeks to compensate for relative nerve/electrode movement by controlling the intensity of the delivered stimuli so as to maintain a substantially constant neural recruitment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFeedback control: Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240173550A1Devices and Methods for Stimulating Neural Tissue
Publication Date: 2024.05.30 SALUDA MEDICAL PTY LTD
  • US20240173550A1 patent drawing
  • US20240173550A1 patent drawing
  • US20240173550A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some implementations, the device may include a neural stimulation system having: an implantable closed-loop neural stimulation device for controllably delivering neural stimuli via one or more stimulus electrodes, the device having the one or more stimulus electrodes and a feedback controller configured to adjust a stimulus intensity parameter so as to maintain a measured neural response intensity at a target response intensity; and a processor configured to: estimate an out-of-compliance current limit for each of the one or more stimulus electrodes; estimate a closed-loop current requirement for the implantable closed-loop neural stimulation device; compare the out-of-compliance current limit for each of the one or more stimulus electrodes to the closed-loop current requirement; and take a mitigating action based on the comparison.