Closed-Loop Neurostimulation for Gait Disturbance Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current neurostimulation systems, particularly deep brain stimulation (DBS), are ineffective in managing gait disturbances and other neurological issues like freezing of gait in Parkinson's Disease, as they operate on a continuous, open-loop basis without adapting to the patient's real-time neuronal state, leading to side effects and insufficient treatment.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop neurostimulation system that continuously samples neuronal activity and other relevant data using invasive and non-invasive sensors, performs advanced data analysis, and adjusts stimulation parameters in real-time based on the patient's current condition, using a body-external processing device to compute and deliver control signals to an implantable unit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If continuous open-loop stimulation is applied, then motor symptoms are reduced, but side effects increase and treatment efficacy decreases for gait disturbances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacyVSAvoidside effects
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static continuous stimulation to dynamic adaptive stimulation that changes parameters in real-time based on detected neuronal states. The stimulation frequency, amplitude, and other parameters are continuously adjusted according to the patient's current physiological condition, making the treatment dynamic rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where neuronal activity is continuously monitored and used to adjust stimulation parameters. Sensors detect neuronal states and provide feedback to the control system, which then modifies the stimulation output accordingly, creating a responsive adaptive control loop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If continuous stimulation is applied, then some motor deficits are treated, but gait disturbances and freezing of gait are insufficiently treated or worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesymptom treatmentVSAvoidresponse to different neurological states
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system adapts stimulation parameters dynamically based on the detected neuronal state. Different stimulation patterns are applied for different neurological conditions - for example, continuous stimulation for tremor control versus burst stimulation for gait disturbance management. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to respond appropriately to varying neurological states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple stimulation parameters including frequency, amplitude, pulse width, and timing patterns based on the detected neuronal state. For gait disturbances, specific parameter configurations are applied that differ from those used for tremor control, enabling versatile treatment of different neurological symptoms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If adaptive neurostimulation is implemented, then treatment efficacy for gait disturbances improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptive treatment efficacyVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into separate functional modules: sensor units for neuronal state detection, processing units for signal analysis and decision-making, and stimulation units for delivering tailored electrical pulses. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A control system acts as an intermediary between the sensors and stimulation deliverers, processing neuronal state information and translating it into appropriate stimulation commands. This intermediary layer manages the complexity by centralizing the decision-making logic and coordinating between different system components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Extent of automation

If multiple sensors and processing units are integrated, then real-time adaptive control is achieved, but device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time adaptive controlVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses multi-functional components that can perform multiple operations. For example, the same electrodes used for stimulation can also detect neuronal activity, and the processing unit handles both signal acquisition and stimulation control. This universality reduces the total number of components needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple functions are merged into integrated units. The sensor array and processing electronics are combined in a single implantable device, and the control system integrates data processing, decision-making, and stimulation delivery in one coordinated system, reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12076567B2System and method for neurostimulation
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 CORTEC GMBH
  • US12076567B2 patent drawing
  • US12076567B2 patent drawing
  • US12076567B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A brain stimulation method and system are provided, wherein neuronal signals of a patient are continuously sensed by at least one sensor device and based on the sensed signals, stimulation signals are applied to the patient by at least one stimulation device, wherein the sensed signals are transmitted to a body-external, portable processing device wherein the sensed signals are evaluated, and based on the evaluated signals stimulation control signals are generated and transmitted to the stimulation device where based on the stimulation control signals the stimulation signals are generated.