Closed Loop Production Management System for Formulation Quality Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In industries where products are manufactured based on specific formulations, changes during production and shipping often occur due to human error, component unavailability, or unforeseen events, leading to quality and cost control issues, and the disjointed nature of sales, purchasing, and production hinders effective management.

Innovation Solution

A production management system that uses a single master database to monitor and control costs and quality across sales, purchasing, manufacturing, and shipping stages, allowing real-time tracking of changes and alerts for deviations from specified tolerances, ensuring consistent product quality and cost management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a traditional production system without integrated monitoring is used, then operational flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but quality consistency and cost control deteriorate due to untracked variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct quality consistencyVSAvoidproduction management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback mechanisms where production parameters (component quantities, costs, quality metrics) are continuously monitored and compared against target values. Deviations trigger alerts and automatic adjustments, creating a closed-loop control system that maintains quality consistency despite operational flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The production management system is segmented into modular components: master database module, sales module, purchasing module, production module, and transport module. Each module independently manages specific aspects (formulations, orders, inventory, manufacturing, shipping) while integrating through standardized data interfaces, reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If independent management of sales, purchasing, production and transport is maintained, then operational independence is preserved, but quality and cost control effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality and cost controlVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges previously independent management functions into an integrated production management system. The master database module serves as a central hub that stores and coordinates data across sales, purchasing, production, and transport modules, enabling unified quality and cost control while maintaining functional independence through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The master database module performs multiple functions: storing formulation data, tracking component inventory, monitoring production parameters, calculating costs, and coordinating logistics. This multi-functional central module reduces the need for separate dedicated systems while maintaining the independence of individual functional modules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If real-time monitoring and control are implemented, then quality consistency and cost management improve, but operational flexibility and responsiveness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality consistencyVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts monitoring intensity and control measures based on real-time conditions. When parameters are within tolerance ranges, the system operates with minimal intervention, preserving operational flexibility. When deviations are detected, the system automatically increases monitoring and triggers corrective actions, ensuring quality consistency without compromising normal operational agility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9519930B2Systems, methods and apparatus for management of a closed loop production system for use in the production of a formulation-based product
Publication Date: 2016.12.13 QUIPIP LLC
  • US9519930B2 patent drawing
  • US9519930B2 patent drawing
  • US9519930B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An order relating to a formulation-based product is received, wherein fulfilling the order requires production of the formulation-based product at a first location, transport of the formulation-based product in a vehicle to a second location different from the first location, and performance of an activity with respect to the formulation-based product at the second location. First information relating to a first change made to the formulation-based product at the first location is received, from the first location, prior to transport of the formulation-based product. Second information relating to a second change made to the formulation-based product during transport of the formulation-based product is received during transport of the formulation-based product. Third information relating to the activity performed with respect to the formulation-based product at the second location is received from the second location.